Just Got my 360 - first impressions *swoon*

Status
Not open for further replies.
scooby_dooby said:
Thats why I couldn't believe some of the Kameo reviews. On GFX alone this game is a 7/10. The GFX are simply stunning, the game could stink and this game would still deserver an easy 7/10 just cause it's so drool-worthy.

in no way a game that stinks should deserve 7/10
 
scooby_dooby said:
And the people who gave it like 6.5? What..the..hell. If this is 6.5, Kong is a 3, and GUN is a 2. Many of the Kameo reviews are totally bogus. This is a great franchise that deserves alot more recognition than it's getting, ah well can't wait till Kameo 2.

QFT.
 
scooby_dooby said:
Thats why I couldn't believe some of the Kameo reviews. On GFX alone this game is a 7/10. The GFX are simply stunning, the game could stink and this game would still deserver an easy 7/10 just cause it's so drool-worthy.

When you pair those GFX with good gameplay, and what is a really fun action adventure game with really fun characters to use, and tons of really cool areas to explore and things do do, how this game gets anything less than 8.5 is beyond me...

And the people who gave it like 6.5? What..the..hell. If this is 6.5, Kong is a 3, and GUN is a 2. Many of the Kameo reviews are totally bogus. This is a great franchise that deserves alot more recognition than it's getting, ah well can't wait till Kameo 2.



Agreed
 
scooby_dooby said:
Thats why I couldn't believe some of the Kameo reviews. On GFX alone this game is a 7/10. The GFX are simply stunning, the game could stink and this game would still deserver an easy 7/10 just cause it's so drool-worthy.

When you pair those GFX with good gameplay, and what is a really fun action adventure game with really fun characters to use, and tons of really cool areas to explore and things do do, how this game gets anything less than 8.5 is beyond me...

And the people who gave it like 6.5? What..the..hell. If this is 6.5, Kong is a 3, and GUN is a 2. Many of the Kameo reviews are totally bogus. This is a great franchise that deserves alot more recognition than it's getting, ah well can't wait till Kameo 2.

Well, let's get straight before it goes wrong:
That's your taste and your opinion, and not everyone share them !

Besides in games, gameplay rule far above gfx, at least for most people out there...

[As a sidenote, although I find most 360 launch title to be underwhelming (to say the least), I think future games can really be something different, something that will make the 360 hardware shine as much as it deserves]
 
Guilty Bystander said:
Mayge you should buy a good HDTV/Monitor cause Kameo has atleast 16x AF.
Never seen so good AF not even on my X1800XT.

Do you have the correct settings on your X18xx card?
 
london-boy said:
Kameo doesn't even look like it has trilinear filtering enabled sometimes, let alone AF. :???:
Indeed - Kameo has any AF? Certainly not on the kiosks I've played, and yes it was the full version and not the demo. If it does, then it's turned off in certain scenes perhaps.
 
Dave Glue said:
Indeed - Kameo has any AF? Certainly not on the kiosks I've played, and yes it was the full version and not the demo. If it does, then it's turned off in certain scenes perhaps.

Which kiosks are using full games?
 
Yeah, I've not been bowled over by PGR3 personally, graphics wise. Awesome game, and initially wow-worthy when you first start winding cars up to good speed and racing, but it looks fairly crap when you spend some time with it.

Texture resolution is sacrificed it seems, outside of photo mode, and especially online when it's drawing a bunch of cars at once.

Great fun though, which is why it rocks.
 
Guilty Bystander said:
Mayge you should buy a good HDTV/Monitor cause Kameo has atleast 16x AF.
Never seen so good AF not even on my X1800XT.

Im sorry but thats not evenly remotely true. Kameo has very bad texture filtering problems in parts. Its not always noticable but when it is, its bad. Nothing remotely like standard 8xAF never mind the enhanced 16x angle independant AF.

http://img.gamespot.com/gamespot/images/2005/317/reviews/516505_20051114_screen012.jpg
http://img.gamespot.com/gamespot/images/2005/317/reviews/516505_20051114_screen020.jpg
http://img.gamespot.com/gamespot/images/2005/317/reviews/516505_20051114_screen058.jpg
http://img.gamespot.com/gamespot/images/2005/317/reviews/516505_20051114_screen059.jpg

Incidentally, the size of those pictures make me wonder if its running at true 720p. The're too big to be 480p and if they are direct frame buffer captures then it looks like Kameo runs at less than 720p. Unless they have been re-sized that is but GS usually shows PC games at there full size.
 
pjbliverpool said:
Im sorry but thats not evenly remotely true. Kameo has very bad texture filtering problems in parts. Its not always noticable but when it is, its bad. Nothing remotely like standard 8xAF never mind the enhanced 16x angle independant AF.

http://img.gamespot.com/gamespot/images/2005/317/reviews/516505_20051114_screen012.jpg
http://img.gamespot.com/gamespot/images/2005/317/reviews/516505_20051114_screen020.jpg
http://img.gamespot.com/gamespot/images/2005/317/reviews/516505_20051114_screen058.jpg
http://img.gamespot.com/gamespot/images/2005/317/reviews/516505_20051114_screen059.jpg

Incidentally, the size of those pictures make me wonder if its running at true 720p. The're too big to be 480p and if they are direct frame buffer captures then it looks like Kameo runs at less than 720p. Unless they have been re-sized that is but GS usually shows PC games at there full size.

Do you even have KAMEO? If you did, you would clearly see the AF goin on. KAMEO is awesome and looks great.
 
Since the last three pages have been nothing but tit-for-tat arguing over one game, I guess this thread is done now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top