Captain Chickenpants said:
Yes
The PSP is not a multimedia PC, it was never intended to store content.Yes a HDD would be cheaper, but it will be a lot less kind on batteries, which for a portable device is a big issue!
I never suggested PSP was a multimedia PC. I suggested a PC would be suitable for transferring content to PSP!
Captain Chickenpants said:
So what about people who don't have a computer? As it stands the PSP can play games and DVD's without any extra device. Are you suggesting that people should have a PC to upload the games they have bought?
There aren't that many interested in PSP who haven't got access to a PC. That's why I suggested a docking station. This would have a DVD drive to transfer data to PSP. Don't tell me a general purpose DVD drive @ todays greatly reduced prices can't compete with expensive UMD/DUO PRO memory as currently advocated on PSP!
Captain Chickenpants said:
Not sure what you mean here.
You posted and I quote
Existing media (such as CD/DVD) is too large for the device.
I presumed you were talking, physcally too large to fit confines of PSP as opposed to the digital content seeing as PSP has no inbuilt storage and is reliant on expensive proprietary memory card for same purpose. I never suggested CD/DVD discs physically being incorporated within PSP confines and merely purposed their data being transferred.
I'm not sure why you made physical comparison when I was talking all along about distributing their content! If you didn't mean physical size then I'm sorry but Sony's choice in storage capacity dictates this deficiency.
Captain Chickenpants said:
So how else are they to sell Movie content for it? Selling downloads requires the user to have sufficient space to store the videos, which adds to the cost of either adding a HD (which will use battery power), or forcing the user to buy large memory cards.
So getting users to buy more expensive UMD disc solely for displaying on PSP only was better alternative tovast number of HDD type PMP's already out there! Many of which equal or surpass PSP's battery efficiency.
Captain Chickenpants said:
I see it as Sony have simply created a media that fits in their device and they are selling content on it. Apparantly UMD movies are selling quite well in the US.
20-Oct-2005 12:30
Such much enthusiasm! UMD content like minidisc before it offers much the same content already available on formats like DVD and still selling CD format! UMD by comparison cost far more. Provides less in comparison at a much reduced resolution and is PSP only! How many more media hungry consumers will have downloaded MP3/WMA, DIVX & XVID content in comparison?
Initial take up is one thing. Sustaining momentum is quite another when what you propose adds additonal cost compared to defacto standards.
Captain Chickenpants said:
So either they have to have a PC, or shell out more money for a docking station?
This wouldn't be much different to XBOX360 HDD choice. Would it?
Captain Chickenpants said:
Obviously you would have to be pretty dim to not think that Sony is also trying to grab money, that is what they do and they are very successful at it. I just think that most of the decisions are fairly reasonable.
Well I have a different view. I look @ the other failed Sony formats! How much did this cost Sony and their supporters?
When I buy something I don't favour isolation from already established formats. UMD is further isolated from future Sony media players by Sony failing to support this format @ home on your TV either via your PSP or any other standalone players suitable for this purpose. PS3/UMD support would've galvanised my enthusiasm and belief that it won't go same way as minidisc. Seeing as this hasn't been proposed by Sony who insist on establishing yet another format, against another well supported format I might add (Notice a pattern here!) UMD will quickly become a niche product like minidisc.
Captain Chickenpants said:
I don't think I have seen any as big as 100GB, but regardless you are still requiring people to transfer the data somehow, wheras the PSP is a sully functional player out of the box, with a media that is more resiliant to wear and tear.
Here's 3 for a start
http://www.mp3players.co.uk/site/uk/archos_av4100.html
http://www.komplett.co.uk/k/ki.asp?sku=314673&cks=PRL and
http://www.komplett.co.uk/k/ki.asp?sku=311133&cks=PRL
I call it researching what I post!
Captain Chickenpants said:
You seem to be very against the UMD format for video distribution, and in all honesty so am I! Why should I buy a film on UMD when I already own it on DVD?
Sony seems to be a serial proponent in failed formats having failed previously with Betamax, minidisc & their continued repositioning of Atrac on MP3 compatible players. I just don't like 1 trick ponies like those Sony favour simple as that. With the continued advances in digital ditrbution I much favour that route than follow a proprietary format no one else supports. Even Sony themselves limit UMD's exposure to mainstream consumers! That says a lot to me.
I appologise for length in reply but there was a lot to reply to.