Qroach said:
No, I am fairly positive of I know where you are coming from, and lets try and keep this civil.
Exactly. However, do you really need to data to see this? If the average age of a PS2 owner is say... 22, and this game sells 10 million copies on the PS2, don't you also think the average age of the people buying this game would fit in with the average PS2 owner age? I really don't see how it can't.
Neither do I, and I am not trying to. If you thought I was, than you just proved that you were missing my point.
Also, I would need the data to be perfectly sure, whereas if I here it from say a corporate exec who has the data (while I don't) I would be inclined to believe them but I couldn't be 100% positive. This is just common sense IMO ("Don't believe everything you hear..."). Although, going by that you could never be 100% sure (but then we are starting to go on a philosophical tangent).
You're completely missing my point. I'm NOT arguing that this is a mature verses an imamture product. Anyone could come in here and say that ALL games are immature! What would you do then? All I'm saying is that there's no doubt this title appeals to older gamers more than say something like SMS.
I would respectfully say I disagree with their opinion and let it be (or maybe try to persuade them otherwise if I were in the mood).
And you are missing my point, I am not saying that I don't think it appeals to older gamers more than SMS (or any other game, I am trying not to compare it to other games), or that it doesn't appeal to older gamers.
All I am saying is that I personally find it immature and that I think that was part of what Teasy was saying. You see? Absolutely nothing to do with who it appeals to or who it is selling to.
Yes, screw them because you know more about the game industry than everyone already in it|?
hey that's your choice, but I choose to believe the people that know these things (specifically SONY).
No, screw them because like I said I have a mind of my own and can formulate my own opinions on what I like or what is mature. I don't need to be told what I should like or find mature. The idea that I should simply bow to their opinion because they are industry insiders(and I am not (yet
)) reminds me of something like 1984.
So, once again, I am entitled to my own opinions about the quality of a title, but if said industry insider wanted to tell me something relating to facts such as which age group a title is selling/appealing to than that would be different.
All I'm saying is that in reality there's no doubt that this game appeals more to older gamers than something like SMS. I honestly don't knnow anyone in the industry that owuld agree with you (except someone from nintnedo perhaps). <b>(Comment: Another 'Appeal to Authority' fallacy)</b>
Basically as I see it, the days were the entire game market was driven by a mario title release have come to an end.
Since you seem to keep bringing up SMS (even though it has little relevance to what I am trying to make a point of) I am once again wondering if you are missing my point. I never once tried to argue that SMS has more appeal to older gamers than GTA3, I never once argued anything about SMS. In fact, I never once said that I don't think GTA3 doesn't appeal to older gamers, simply that I personally find it a fun but immature game.