I think confirms it.

[TEXAN]

I think this confirms it.

http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=jks183&b=1&f=o1130465517&p=2

http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=jks183&b=1&f=o1130465516&p=1

After looking at these scans of Virtua Fighter 5 there is absolutely no way the GPU inside the LINDBERGH is a 6800, has to be the new G72. That's why on the official spec sheet all it said was - "Nvidia GPU" and it never went in to specifics on which GPU or in depth to any of it's specs aside from the fact that it does PS/VS3.0. Obviously as the chip hasn't been unvieled Nvidia didn't want any info it being released.

http://www.ukresistance.co.uk/pics3/lindbergh.jpg

 

[London Geezer]

Uhm... Yeah from those scans i would guess they're running on early G90 prototypes... Totally.


/sarcasm

 

[Shifty Geezer]

Looks like nVidia unified shader solution with SM4.0 to me. How else can they get that realistic moire patterning?

Ummm, I think this thread should be locked for TEXAN starts receiving hostile looks. It certainly serves no useful purpose, nor will it ever posses any intelligent content.

 

[Pozer]

[troll] Sweet, Super Wax Fighters 3000!!! [/troll]

Seriously its hard to tell anything from those scans.....

 

[TEEDA]

Wow ! those screens are nice ! You can see the veins and the extreme details on the catcher character.
The lighting seems to be really well implemented.

 

[V3]

After looking at these scans of Virtua Fighter 5 there is absolutely no way the GPU inside the LINDBERGH is a 6800, has to be the new G72. That's why on the official spec sheet all it said was - "Nvidia GPU" and it never went in to specifics on which GPU or in depth to any of it's specs aside from the fact that it does PS/VS3.0. Obviously as the chip hasn't been unvieled Nvidia didn't want any info it being released.

http://www.ukresistance.co.uk/pics3/lindbergh.jpg

Its a 256 MB 7800 GTX maybe higher clock with dual slot cooling solution, there is no reason to put a 6800 in there. 7800 is cooler and performs better than 6800.

I doubt its G72, since Lindbergh was showcase around 7800 announcement.

 

[Dave Baumann]

So far, G72 has turned up to be a replacement to the low end NV44.

 

[Alpha_Spartan]

These scans rip DOA3.5 a new arsehole on lighting and shadowing alone.

 

[RavenFox]

Skin textures are much better than the other guy I must say.

 

[czekon]

These scans rip DOA3.5 a new arsehole on lighting and shadowing alone.

very true :smile:

 

[Edge]

Alpha_Spartan, you think you can raise your head out of the muck, and leave vulgar comments out of your posts?

 

[pegisys]

I will like to see how this system compares to the new consoles in a few years, this should be the best comparision of pc hardware and console hardware from the same time frame

 

[Guden Oden]

These scans completely suck, and anyone using them to compare image quality to some other game on some other platform and believing this game comes out on top is surely smoking some heavy dope. Coz these scans really suck.

 

[Mefisutoferesu]

Hmm... Texan, you have any information on the Saruken character? I'm looking forward to playing that, but aside from the first handcam stuff there's been nothing. Anyway, I imagine if anyone knows anything about this it's you.

 

[<nu>faust]

yeah it look real cool when they show a close up of the fighter but.... the thing is some of next gen games like this one dont look that good when you are playing with the standart camera position.Look at the shots when there are two fighter and the scenery in the back(like classical 3d figher camera position), those shots dont look that much better looking than tekken 5 .

 

[BlueTsunami]

I love you Virtua Fighter 5!

 

[Hardknock]

The most impressive screens of those scans are NOT real-time but CG.

There's a very noticeable difference in quality between this real-time direct capture screen: http://img.gamespot.com/gamespot/images/2005/243/929654_20050901_screen001.jpg

And some of the images in that scan.

 

[TEXAN]

Everything that you see in those scans are in-game realtime.

There is no CG in use anywhere.

 

[BlueTsunami]

The most impressive screens of those scans are NOT real-time but CG.

There's a very noticeable difference in quality between this real-time direct capture screen: http://img.gamespot.com/gamespot/images/2005/243/929654_20050901_screen001.jpg

And some of the images in that scan.

Isn't that an OLD screen shot? The newer scans (the reason this thread was created) are newer ones. I remember the shot you posted from a few months back.

 

[Hardknock]

Isn't that an OLD screen shot? The newer scans (the reason this thread was created) are newer ones. I remember the shot you posted from a few months back.

No. That is from September 1st.