Had DC been a success who would have failed? PS2/XB/GC?

Had DC been a success who would have failed? PS2/XB/GC?


  • Total voters
    161

Deepak

B3D Yoddha
Veteran
XB IMO.

And how would it had affected the performance of other consoles? BTW when was XB conceptualised, was it before DC release?
 
ps2 . If dc was a sucess the ps2 wouldn't have had all the third party support to itself for that year and may have had a much smaller head start against the xbox and the cube which would have hurt it bad
 
Dc was the first experiment of MS with Windows CE.

Would the DC be a success, maybe the xbox would not have exist at all.
 
If DC hadn't failed, Sega wouldn't have gone multiplatform, therefore the console that profited the most from Sega games would have had less of a reason to be bought by the public.
Proportionally, the Xbox is the console that had the most "Sega console" image out of the 3 remaining, so i guess if you take Sega games out of the Xbox equation, things would have been very different.
However, you have to think how big the impact of Sega games were on the 3 consoles. Very small if you ask me, compared to all the rest. So i'm not sure how anyone can just give out a name like this.
Sega failed hardware-wise, and couldn't even get their software to be of much importance on 3 other consoles, except for a handful of titles, if even that.
I mean... Sonic with guns? How low can they get... :?
 
What did Sega do wrong with the DC? If you think about it, nothing really.

They just ran out of cash.
 
TEXAN said:
What did Sega do wrong with the DC? If you think about it, nothing really.

They just ran out of cash.

I guess they started doing something wrong in the early 90's with the add-on crazyness.
 
What did Sega do wrong with the DC? If you think about it, nothing really.
sony didn't kill the dc imo, it was the impending launch of the gc and xbox that stalled hardware (and later software) sales for sega. what sega did wrong is they launched too early. only the early adapters bought one. by the time the rest of the gaming world was interested in dc the ps2 was out and the gc/xbox were right around the corner.

had sega not failed i think it's safe to think that ms would be out of the picture this generation. the xbox got some nice sega love early on with segaGT and jet set future, eventualy spawning the first holiday bundle. without the immediate support from sega, i think ms would have had a much harder time selling systems, particularly in japan (where they got slaughtered anyway), but also in the us. sure, sony and nintendo got sega titles, but i think their systems would sell by name alone. ms was the new kid on the block.
 
I would be tempted to say GC because XB would have stayed alive simply by pure infusion of cash. But XB I dont really think XB would really have even gotten off the ground in the first place.
 
TEXAN said:
What did Sega do wrong with the DC? If you think about it, nothing really.

They just ran out of cash.

They ran out of cash becuase no one wanted to develop for a console with such a poor excuse for copy-protection.
 
I love it when people blame a huge thing like this on ONE single event/reason.

Sega went the way they went because of MANY reasons over the course of MANY years.

Generalising, saying "They went down because THIS happened" is as limited as saying "The war on Iraq happened because we had to liberate the Iraqi people".
 
Well I hate it when people deny the pivotal factor in a situation in favor of broad reaching generalisations which are completely wothless. Seriously, the moment the general poplutation discovered how easy it was to copy DC games the developers rightfuly stoped looking at it as a viable platform. I watched it happen, if you want to deny it because you liked geting free copies of games or whatever then thats your bag but it doesn't change what happened.
 
kyleb said:
Well I hate it when people deny the pivotal factor in a situation in favor of broad reaching generalisations which are completely wothless. Seriously, the moment the general poplutation discovered how easy it was to copy DC games the developers rightfuly stoped looking at it as a viable platform. I watched it happen, if you want to deny it because you liked geting free copies of games or whatever then thats your bag but it doesn't change what happened.

Err i never had a DC. Nor i'm someone who likes to go cheap on his purchases, thank you.
All i was saying is that there are many factors, and i'm not sure your copy protection argument is the best.
If anything, Sega went the way of the dodo because they totally fucked up the success they gained in the Genesis days with very questionable management decisions and by the time DC was out they had no money. And many other reasons, copy un-protection being one of them.
 
I can hardly see the point of this thread, I think we should concentrate on this reality/dimension for crying out loud!. The fact is that Dreamcast is dead and rightly so. Let the dead rest.
 
Back
Top