GTA psp pics
- Thread starter hey69
- Start date
mckmas8808
Legend
Yeap ever heard someone say graphics don't matter. Well I don't agree but the GTA games are great looking games for what they offer. That's superior gameplay. Isn't this what people cry about there is a lack of these days?
mckmas8808
Legend
Yeah for a PC you're right. For the Xbox too even.
digitalwanderer
Legend
I disagree. With that 10x drawdistance mod, 6xAA & 16xAF I think GTA:SA looks great!jvd said:
Yea, the graphics are low poly and low texture, and the animation often jerky and framerate not 60fps.
Actually my jaw hit the floor the first time I played GTA:VC, not having played any GTA games before that I had little idea how the game would look except from screenshots.
But it wasn't because I was so impressed with the graphics, it was because it really didn't look like a PS2 game, but a PSOne game. The fact that the first thing you saw in VC was you standing in some empty alleyway with non-texured walls. That really didn't give a good first impression. After the first shock you stepped into the main street and saw the busy city streets ahead, and you knew this was going to be something special. The next surprise came when you got your first flying vehicle.
In GTA games it's not the highly detailed graphics that make it look good, but the scope and the "feel" of actually being in the environment. Some games have tried to imitate this with better graphics, but fell short on the athmosphere. Maybe it's because of the low detail that it leaves much to your imagination, like when you read a book without graphics
i just love the feeling of exploration the GTA games have offered, the initial frustration when you're lost in the environment, gradually getting to know the streets.
Actually my jaw hit the floor the first time I played GTA:VC, not having played any GTA games before that I had little idea how the game would look except from screenshots.
But it wasn't because I was so impressed with the graphics, it was because it really didn't look like a PS2 game, but a PSOne game. The fact that the first thing you saw in VC was you standing in some empty alleyway with non-texured walls. That really didn't give a good first impression. After the first shock you stepped into the main street and saw the busy city streets ahead, and you knew this was going to be something special. The next surprise came when you got your first flying vehicle.
In GTA games it's not the highly detailed graphics that make it look good, but the scope and the "feel" of actually being in the environment. Some games have tried to imitate this with better graphics, but fell short on the athmosphere. Maybe it's because of the low detail that it leaves much to your imagination, like when you read a book without graphics
i just love the feeling of exploration the GTA games have offered, the initial frustration when you're lost in the environment, gradually getting to know the streets.
Of course jvd... of course.jvd said:
IMO GTA games do have "scope", I don't necessarily know how that scope compares to other scopy games and whether some game is more scopier than other, and really I don't know why should I compare them with morrowind or EQ2.
That's not the point, if GTA is the scopiest game of all to crush other games with their scopiness that are not on PS2 or PSP anyway1!!1!1!!!!111
The point was that GTA games do offer a gaming experience where you feel you are in that big expansive world, with it's limits of course.
So, you say Morrowind and EQ2 cry out scope, GTA sucks in scope department.
Fine, but I still don't understand why you should compare them as they are very different gaming experiences, not to mention having been developed for different platforms.
I'm not the one claiming it has scope . You guys are . I clearly pointed out the platform on which i'm playing the game and pointed out its horrible graphics on that platform and the fact that the developers are to lasy to update it . It is you who are trying to switch over to a diffrent platform than what i brought up .
Morrowind is on 2 of the 3 platforms this game apears in .
Morrowind is on 2 of the 3 platforms this game apears in .
Uh :? I don't think you're playing the PSP GTA on any platform yet.
You brought up a PC to a PSP thread, not to mention some PC and xbox games to a PSP thread.
GTA's are not known for their detailed graphics, everybody whos ever played them knows it, and accepts it.
The devs might be lazy on the graphics engine department, but they certainly aren't lazy on the gameplay department.
Despite the shortcomings in graphics GTA games have managed to pull me in the gameworld few games have been able to. Better than any other similar type game with much better graphics, so they must be doing something right even if they are lazy
You brought up a PC to a PSP thread, not to mention some PC and xbox games to a PSP thread.
GTA's are not known for their detailed graphics, everybody whos ever played them knows it, and accepts it.
The devs might be lazy on the graphics engine department, but they certainly aren't lazy on the gameplay department.
Despite the shortcomings in graphics GTA games have managed to pull me in the gameworld few games have been able to. Better than any other similar type game with much better graphics, so they must be doing something right even if they are lazy
Ok, fair enough.
I just felt that you unnecessarily clinged on my word "scope" when I was (generally) talking about GTA games and what makes them so good imo.
That sticking to one descriptive word gave me the impression you think GTA games are worse in that regard than most games. That impression of mine was reinforced by your comparison with other games.
Sorry.
Edit: I don't see where in my recent posts you see "Sony bias" :?
Just because I happen to like GTA games as they are makes me a Sony trollboy???
Wow! Can't one say one non negative thing about anything that is even remotely connected to Sony, and express even a slightest doubt towards MS without being called "Sony biased"
I just felt that you unnecessarily clinged on my word "scope" when I was (generally) talking about GTA games and what makes them so good imo.
That sticking to one descriptive word gave me the impression you think GTA games are worse in that regard than most games. That impression of mine was reinforced by your comparison with other games.
Sorry.
Edit: I don't see where in my recent posts you see "Sony bias" :?
Just because I happen to like GTA games as they are makes me a Sony trollboy???
Wow! Can't one say one non negative thing about anything that is even remotely connected to Sony, and express even a slightest doubt towards MS without being called "Sony biased"
