My position on this very issue (the press release issued by Sony) is simple : the "gap is closing" comment, considering no specific context was mentioned in the PR (no "monthly gap", no "marketshare")
Well, that is where we disagree. The figures that were presented were January figures, hence the context of monthly sales. Considering this with that the statement is true in this context, and false in the other, I am the kind of person that assumes the former is intended.
I don't like how current journalists always strive to bring you "balance" in the sense of "a different story" (not a different perspective).
I agree that there is a line that can be crossed, but I'm willing to venture a guess that Sony is more often on the receiving end of that line than vice versa.
[qupte]I'm really sorry about that, and I apologize for my less than tactful tone, which is provoked by what I see as desperate spinning unfit of someone I generally can have an honest disagreement with.[/quote]
Accepted, but let's keep our cool and try to read each others words carefully, so that our discussions stay focussed on the actual disagreement.
It irks me to see those people not eating their crow while it's hot like gentlemen, but instead fall back on sorry excuses, especially when they ridiculed those exact same excuses when made by NGC fans.
The words "I was wrong" are indeed some of the hardest to type and pronounce in the English language.
For my part, I do think I myself may have underestimated how well the DS would do, but then the DS is actually dead now, and when I considered the PSPs chances, the DS Lite didn't exist yet.
That was a bit of a rethorical question. If Nintendo had released a nonsense PR claiming "closing the gap with the PS2" based on a single month of data with a stockless PS2 still outselling it, do you agree with me that it would have been ridiculed (and for good reasons) by the very same people right now trying to spin this Sony PR ?
My issue with your comment is simply that you overlooked that we actually agree on this point, which, if you had read my posts more carefully, you would have been able to pick up on in no less than two posts.
Anyway, sorry for becoming angry earlier, back to our regular gentlemanly debate.
Welcome back!