I am NOT telling people to boycott! I am just pointing out that supporting your favorite vendor despite the high price with the hope of "good things to come" is irrational economic behavior...
I am NOT telling people to boycott! I am just pointing out that supporting your favorite vendor despite the high price with the hope of "good things to come" is irrational economic behavior...
Sounds like he/she is full of it. PS3 devkits (or test/debug kits) don't allow playback of PS1/PS2 titles..Nope, the one who released it (pirotic, on the eurogamer forums) later said it's hardware BC + software upscale, from a devkit.
I am NOT telling people to boycott! I am just pointing out that supporting your favorite vendor despite the high price with the hope of "good things to come" is irrational economic behavior...
Sounds like he/she is full of it. PS3 devkits (or test/debug kits) don't allow playback of PS1/PS2 titles..
Dean
to save money. Removing those chips saves perhaps $25 per machine sold. It has no other impact on the machine, and has nothing to do with scaling or audio (unless Sony did some totally mental design here!)So what happens now? Why is it that they are taking away the hardware for BC?
Pretty much a certainty. That's the only hardware they could sensibly remove.So apologies if this question has been answered already, but does this mean that EU PS3s don't have EE and GS?
The 65nm reduction would be the key place for cost reductions to come. My guessis price will remain what it is to milk early sales at great profitability (or rather, less loss!), with the price reduction happening when sales drop below a threshold amount. A price drop this year wouldn't be out of the question.If so, price should drop much sooner than expected... Same is valid for other territories i guess...
Pretty much a certainty. That's the only hardware they could sensibly remove.
The 65nm reduction would be the key place for cost reductions to come. My guessis price will remain what it is to milk early sales at great profitability (or rather, less loss!), with the price reduction happening when sales drop below a threshold amount. A price drop this year wouldn't be out of the question.
If that's all you wanted to say, here's the canonical answer:I am NOT telling people to boycott! I am just pointing out that supporting your favorite vendor despite the high price with the hope of "good things to come" is irrational economic behavior...
Presumably so. Assuming no extra hardware is being added to the new machines, emulation is entirely on Cell and RSX. That was an intention of KK's who said the PS3 hardware is powerful enough to emulate PS2 entirely in software. Presumably in the vaunted OS upgrade, emulation is shifted to software only. Those with EE+GS will likely have the option to use either method. If not, people playing existing BC games might find they stop working on PS3 with the update, which will make them and to internet forums toOne question would be would current PS3s be able to take advantage of such improvements to emulation ?
i´m more on the "no way will i help Microsoft gain yet another monopoly" so anyone that isn´t Microsoft will see my money.
Presumably so. Assuming no extra hardware is being added to the new machines, emulation is entirely on Cell and RSX. That was an intention of KK's who said the PS3 hardware is powerful enough to emulate PS3 entirely in software. Presumably in the vaunted OS upgrade, emulation is shifted to software only. Those with EE+GS will likely have the option to use either method. If not, people playing existing BC games might find they stop working on PS3 with the update, which will make them and to internet forums to
I'm still not convinced that it's possible. The eDRAM at least would need to be physically in the box somewhere IMO.Presumably so. Assuming no extra hardware is being added to the new machines, emulation is entirely on Cell and RSX. That was an intention of KK's who said the PS3 hardware is powerful enough to emulate PS2 entirely in software.
I'm still not convinced that it's possible. The eDRAM at least would need to be physically in the box somewhere IMO.
Someone will just have to make that sacrifice to humanity and rip the new revision apart.
Yes, of course. But I'd expect access to B/C functionality on devkits to be restricted to those working on the project in the appropriate R&D groups (or in compatibility QA). The poster quoted from Eurogamer (Pirotic) has his occupation listed as a freelance programmer working on stuff for websites, so I think that probably excludes him.Surely they have to produce some form of devkit that B/C can be tested on?