Trying to undermine modded Skyrim's visuals based on a single user's preference on more aggressive bloom and DoF is fruitless.
Don't like the character faces/proportions? Get different mods that suits your tastes with more realistic bodies/faces/eyes/skin/etc.
Don't like the way characters move? Choose one from hundreds of mods with character animations, many of them made by hundreds of contributors, with some of them using state-of-the-art body capture techniques.
Don't like the excessive bloom/DoF/lens-flares? Reduce it or disable it at your own tastes.
No company will be able to create assets that can compare to the millions of hours spent by the tens of thousands of contributors of Skyrim. Not so soon at least.
Regardless of one's tastes about videos from a single user.
I'm not saying Inquisition looks bad. I'll buy it full-price at launch and I believe it'll have a decent plot, great character development, decent voice-acting and lots of other things that Skyrim severely lacks.
It just doesn't look as good as what I achieved with my modded Skyrim a year ago.
I don't get the meaningless comparisons with Skyrim. I don't really care what some "modded-up-the-wazoo"-Skyrim build on PC looks like, as the vanilla game looks like dog-shite compared to this, and the vanilla Skyrim was what I and the vast majority of skyrim players played.
Given how some mods at Skyrim Nexus have been downloaded by over 5 million
different users (and these don't include people using mods from Steam Workshop), I'd say you're completely wrong.
At least for PC users. If you played the game on a console then yes: your game looked
dog-shite.
