Dang...

suryad said:
Question is...will that work in SLI?! And also if that is an efficient design...meaning that it would provide an over 50% performance increase at least?

Notice there is no SLI bridge on the card.

As far as efficiency goes, all they did was take two cores, put them on one board and utilize SLI to combine them. As such it won't perform any better then two 7800 GTs in SLi except possibly by a marginal amount due to reduced latencies.
 
ANova said:
Notice there is no SLI bridge on the card.

As far as efficiency goes, all they did was take two cores, put them on one board and utilize SLI to combine them. As such it won't perform any better then two 7800 GTs in SLi except possibly by a marginal amount due to reduced latencies.

You think they will still require the mobo to be SLI compatible to work with this card?
 
Kanyamagufa said:
You think they will still require the mobo to be SLI compatible to work with this card?
Er, I as far as I know the previous single-card SLI products didn't require the motherboard to support SLI. What they did require was a special BIOS, possibly that allows the slot to run in 2x8 fashion (with one 8x link to each chip, so that the host system sees it as one card). If you remember, Gigabyte did offer the motherboard that supported this wierd setup along with the product.

One has to wonder whether ASUS will go the same motherboard bundling route, or whether they've just been careful to ensure that all of their motherboards support this functionality, or whether they've circumvented the problem entirely somehow.
 
I fail to see the point of these sorts of cards frankly. The whole point of Sli is having a future upgrade option isn't it? I can certainly understand the show-off factor, but really...

The thing I'd worry about would be if it requires special drivers. Usually when thats the case your chances of keeping up to date arn't so hot.

I've had unpleasant experiences trying to get two different Gigabyte 3D1 systems running before. Both failed horribly. In one case it was returned, as not only wouldn't it get past post, but the screen was corrupted badly. it eventually was replaced with a different mobo + x800xl, which ended up faster, $200 cheaper and quieter. :/

Question is...will that work in SLI?!

well if that card no, there is a quad-sli motherboard in the works;
http://www.hkepc.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=475438
so maybe gigabytes next dual chip card may potentially support it (assuiming that MB allows 4 card SLi, not just 2x 2 card sli) - it would be a logical assumpsion if they have cracked 4x sli for single cards they could do 2x sli for dual. I remember reading somewhere that MSI's scrapped dual 6800 was doing to support dual, but not sure how true that was, may have just been for two monitors.

Does anyone know if CrossFire has provisions for more than 2 cards? I know radeons are designed to work in upto 16 (?) card combinations when used in military aps, so I would have thought something similar would be possible on consumer level cards. I can see a quad x1600 system being quite nice for the price. :smile:
 
Graham said:
Does anyone know if CrossFire has provisions for more than 2 cards? I know radeons are designed to work in upto 16 (?) card combinations when used in military aps, so I would have thought something similar would be possible on consumer level cards. I can see a quad x1600 system being quite nice for the price. :smile:

This is kinda OT, but I could've sworn ATI had a cluster of 64 Radeons working together somewhere...

Either way, it definately sounds as though it would be plausible.

Are the chips ATI uses for those Mil. installations configured through the outputs the same way Crossfire is? Or are they networked some special way?
 
I fail to see the point of these sorts of cards frankly. The whole point of Sli is having a future upgrade option isn't it? I can certainly understand the show-off factor, but really...

Purely imo, considering one 7800 GTX performs as well as or better then two 6800 GT/Ultras in SLi, has more features and consumes quite a bit less power I think SLi is mainly aimed at those who want the best performance they can get regardless of the cost. The upgrade path idea doesn't quite make sense to me; especially taking into fact that SLi provides small gains on the whole.

doesnt the G70 consume less power then NV40/45?

Yup.
 
Graham said:
Does anyone know if CrossFire has provisions for more than 2 cards? I know radeons are designed to work in upto 16 (?) card combinations when used in military aps, so I would have thought something similar would be possible on consumer level cards. I can see a quad x1600 system being quite nice for the price. :smile:
There's nothing in hardware that should prevent this. You'd just have to have all but one card be a master. Adding the support in ATI drivers for more than two cards in Crossfire should be trivial, but scaling will go down somewhat (specifically, alternate frame rendering will make much less sense, and you'll have to drop back to the lower-performing split-frame and supertiling modes...this limitation would not be unique to ATI hardware).
 
Just think of it as a Far Side homage. :)

As for the topic, previous dual-GPU GFs (like the Gigabyte 6600GT) have required an SLI MB, IIRC, so this one may, too. But a quad SLI board might support two of these, assuming you won't trip the circuit breaker. ;)
 
Uhh, pointless. Just simply dont get the point of these cards beyond the wow factor. But rather they simply scream "pointless!" to me.
 
Back
Top