I'm not quite so optimistic. The level of scientific research has been, as is typical, pretty dire. Thousands of investigations, yet when it comes to something like trying to ascertain which treatments are actually useful, most are no good for all sorts of reasons. 'Science' still largely operates on the level of random testing. Stick a rat with a load of substance and see what happens, and then draw a conclusion. Or find a group of a people having some treatment and measure what happens with 43,296 other variables at play. If science was conducted as it should be, we shouldn't be getting conflicting info. All we really get are lots of numbers and people interpreting them in different ways.
I think we'll be getting conflicting reports and ideas for many years to come, and few real answers. We have a jigsaw puzzle with 100,000 pieces, no-one knows what it should be, and we only have about 1,000 pieces to hand. Covid19 might give us another 500.