This is silly though, and against what we've been led to expect. All games are supposed to be being rendered at HD resolutions and downscaled for SDTV. This should give better sampling at a cost of fidelity, and result in less jaggies at lower resolution. Take a 720p screenshot and downscale it via both point sampling and a bilinear resize, and you see the downsampled image gains a degree of AA.ninzel said:The only difference between playing a 360 game on an SD vs HDTV will be resolution. At a higher resolution jaggies will be less noticeable but they are still there.
Shifty Geezer said:This is silly though, and against what we've been led to expect. All games are supposed to be being rendered at HD resolutions and downscaled for SDTV. This should give better sampling at a cost of fidelity, and result in less jaggies at lower resolution. Take a 720p screenshot and downscale it via both point sampling and a bilinear resize, and you see the downsampled image gains a degree of AA.
Downsampling should improve texture and edge antialiasing. It won't get rid of aliasing altogether though. It depends what sort of aliasing mrboo is seeing as to whether he's expecting too much from downsampling or whether the games aren't being resized. If they're being rendered at 640x480, you're XB360 is working perhaps as little as a third as hard on the graphics front as in HD, which is a shocking waste of resources.
Well, that is apparently what happens. Anything with a 480i/p output target set in the dashboard will have a 640x480 framebuffer. Several games have exhibited performance improvements when played in SD resolutions compared to running in HD.Shifty Geezer said:If they're being rendered at 640x480, you're XB360 is working perhaps as little as a third as hard on the graphics front as in HD, which is a shocking waste of resources.
Mmmkay said:Well, that is apparently what happens. Anything with a 480i/p output target set in the dashboard will have a 640x480 framebuffer. Several games have exhibited performance improvements when played in SD resolutions compared to running in HD.
There are other motivations to reduce the framebuffer too, like with HUD visibility which would be somewhat impaired when the text/overlay is downsampled.
buy a VGA cable if you have a decent monitor. you will be impressed.mrboo said:Ive just brought Kameo and the jaggie's are horrible, i really gotta get an HDTV ASAP.
Depends on the scaler. A fixed-pixel resize on a fixed-pixel display will look kinda rough, but you should be getting interpolation. The result will be somewhere between the same jaggies and slightly less but the whole screen having lessc clarity (assuming a 1080 native display, and the 1080i support isn't on a 720p)ninzel said:Edit: So does that mean that if the game is done at 720p,and I play it on a TV that display's 1080i that AA will actually appear worse ?
Well if it stays that way, PS3 (and maybe even Wii) could look a lot better on SD sets, certainly enough to make that an influence on purchasing decision. If you had a choice between NFL with current-gen style jaggies and shimmer, or NFL with a miminal extra 2x AA, which machine would you prefer it on? Though showing HD sets in store, if there is a quality difference on SD sets I guess punters wouldn't know it.Mmmkay said:Well, that is apparently what happens. Anything with a 480i/p output target set in the dashboard will have a 640x480 framebuffer. Several games have exhibited performance improvements when played in SD resolutions compared to running in HD.
Potentially, depending on how the HUD is laid out. But if you use a HUD designed for SDTV and work that upwards for HDTV it shouldn't be an issue, or render the HUD differently for HD and SD resolutions but render the rest of the game at 720p and downscale.There are other motivations to reduce the framebuffer too, like with HUD visibility which would be somewhat impaired when the text/overlay is downsampled.