MazingerDUDE
Regular
Disembodied voice of the Mod : Moved from the IQ analysis thread.
I'm not sure if it's appropriate to post this here... (So you should have posted it elsewhere ) ..., but I recently got the newer 360 model, mainly for the HDMI. I was using my old 360 with the component cable, which was actually great, other than some minor overscan issues, the color looked vibrant, the image was sharp etc.
So, I was expecting only the best with the HDMI..
And I'm really suprised to find out that it's actually worse on the HDMI. I have no idea what causes this, maybe it's just my TV since it's a Sony Bravia, probably more optimized for the PS3 color space, but the 360 HDMI just looked bad when compared to the PS3.
http://www3.telus.net/public/dhwag/HDMI360vsPS3.jpg
this is the BioShock on exact same brightness setting, and of course the TV setting is exactly the same as well, and I even used the same HDMI cable too (Monster)
What's even more suprising is the Sonic
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/yoda-dip-jp/
the screen captures from our friend in Japan show that it's the PS3 version that's got the washed out color with the blur, but when I was running the demo on my TV, it was exactly the opposite
http://www3.telus.net/public/dhwag/HDMI360vsPS3A.jpg
(The PS3 is set to RGB 'LIMITED' and the 360 Reference set to Standard)
http://www3.telus.net/public/dhwag/HDMI360vsPS3B.jpg
This one's Tomb Raider UW, and the overall IQ difference is simply staggering.
Now this makes me wonder how are things on HDTVs from other brands, like Samsung, LG, Sharp etc.
At least on my Bravia, all these IQ comparisons based on the screen capture seem completely irrelevant
Mod : The analysis avoids completely these variations due to setup, letting us know exactly what the engine is outputting. In terms of colour intensity, contrast, etc., if we want we can use evaluation systems (histograms) to know exactly which has higher contrast, saturation etc. on output without the choice of display or cabling having any effect.
I'm not sure if it's appropriate to post this here... (So you should have posted it elsewhere ) ..., but I recently got the newer 360 model, mainly for the HDMI. I was using my old 360 with the component cable, which was actually great, other than some minor overscan issues, the color looked vibrant, the image was sharp etc.
So, I was expecting only the best with the HDMI..
And I'm really suprised to find out that it's actually worse on the HDMI. I have no idea what causes this, maybe it's just my TV since it's a Sony Bravia, probably more optimized for the PS3 color space, but the 360 HDMI just looked bad when compared to the PS3.
http://www3.telus.net/public/dhwag/HDMI360vsPS3.jpg
this is the BioShock on exact same brightness setting, and of course the TV setting is exactly the same as well, and I even used the same HDMI cable too (Monster)
What's even more suprising is the Sonic
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/yoda-dip-jp/
the screen captures from our friend in Japan show that it's the PS3 version that's got the washed out color with the blur, but when I was running the demo on my TV, it was exactly the opposite
http://www3.telus.net/public/dhwag/HDMI360vsPS3A.jpg
(The PS3 is set to RGB 'LIMITED' and the 360 Reference set to Standard)
http://www3.telus.net/public/dhwag/HDMI360vsPS3B.jpg
This one's Tomb Raider UW, and the overall IQ difference is simply staggering.
Now this makes me wonder how are things on HDTVs from other brands, like Samsung, LG, Sharp etc.
At least on my Bravia, all these IQ comparisons based on the screen capture seem completely irrelevant
Mod : The analysis avoids completely these variations due to setup, letting us know exactly what the engine is outputting. In terms of colour intensity, contrast, etc., if we want we can use evaluation systems (histograms) to know exactly which has higher contrast, saturation etc. on output without the choice of display or cabling having any effect.