gokickrocks said:i think it is 20MBps transfer rate and 300GB capacity for first gen discs...still plenty however
http://www.maxell-usa.com/Content/P...rtment=maxellusa_pr&Line=datapr&Open=datapr41
...which would be 160mbps
gokickrocks said:i think it is 20MBps transfer rate and 300GB capacity for first gen discs...still plenty however
http://www.maxell-usa.com/Content/P...rtment=maxellusa_pr&Line=datapr&Open=datapr41
Bill said:You can always use more storage.
Blu Ray> HDDVD because of storage.
Holograph>Blu Ray because of storage.
Eventually.
Shogmaster said:Timing wise, HVD might have a better chance at DVD like success than Blu-ray and HD-DVD due to timing IMO. DVD sales are way too healthy and HDTV penetration way too low to convince the masses to switch to BR nor HD-DVD.
I think it's too early for a successful format transition.
jvd said:So what if we'd have to wait to 2008 for holographic discs to be ready.
It be worth it .
Bjorn said:The disc will probably have to come down to 1-2$ before it'll be viable as a replacement for BR/HDDVD and i just don't see that happen. But it would sure be nice if it did.
gokickrocks said:about $100...costs need to come down for it to be more viable to the ordinary consumer
jvd said:the speeds for data transfer are crazy
Thats why i don't see the point of bluray or hd-dvd
Shogmaster said:Timing wise, HVD might have a better chance at DVD like success than Blu-ray and HD-DVD due to timing IMO. DVD sales are way too healthy and HDTV penetration way too low to convince the masses to switch to BR nor HD-DVD.
I think it's too early for a successful format transition.
Shogmaster said:Timing wise, HVD might have a better chance at DVD like success than Blu-ray and HD-DVD due to timing IMO. DVD sales are way too healthy and HDTV penetration way too low to convince the masses to switch to BR nor HD-DVD.
I think it's too early for a successful format transition.
mckmas8808 said:EACH DISC $100 !!!
typoEDR said:I can see holographic storage having use in fields that require that amount of mass storage (audio/video/etc.), but Blu-Ray (or even HD-DVD) is sufficient for films and video games.
PC-Engine said:The first BRDs were selling for about $80...
mckmas8808 said:How many years ago was that?
So who is selling a HVD player? You do know people have to actually buy HVD players to buy HVD movies right? Oh that's another thing, who's selling HVD movies?
Oh I forgot nobody. So until we start hearing news that Paramount or somebody like that are putting their movies on HVD disc this arguement is NULL!!
Do you guys not understand that adoption rate does matter to these movie companies. There will millions of Blu-ray players sold before HVD players (If any are made) will even see the light of day.
jvd said:How is this diffrent than hvd ?
Bobbler said:Frankly, the idea that HVD will overtake BR/HD-DVD is completely absurd. HVD is a good idea, but its a bit too much too soon and has no real backing by any content companies (therefore leaving it to a storage backup format entirely, which I think you'll find a vast majority of people don't care about and certainly don't need 300+GB discs).