Tkumpathenurple
Veteran
Might it be the case that they'll make that push next CES? Neither the PS4 nor the Pro can take advantage of that feature, so to some extent, they'd just be advertising the superior capabilities of the X1X.
Might it be the case that they'll make that push next CES? Neither the PS4 nor the Pro can take advantage of that feature, so to some extent, they'd just be advertising the superior capabilities of the X1X.
That's really surprising as even TCL is planning to roll out HDMI 2.1 across a range of TVs in preparation of the next gen consoles coming out.
Regards,
SB
Yeah, I'm hoping it's just an oversite in the press release, but only one TV lists 4K/120 Hz support which implies HDMI 2.1. Nothing else.
https://www.sony.com/content/sony/e...d-picture-quality-and-sound-capabilities.html
The funny thing is it's not even the top of the line LCD, just the mid range one. I really want a higher end one with good viewing angles (their X-wide Angle filter) so if the press release is accurate, I need to choose viewing angles or 4k/120 Hz support. It's a real head scratcher.
I'm also in the market for a new 55" TV but I can wait. I'm thinking of skipping OLED and waiting for micro-LED/mini-LED.I’m super disappointed in the announced Sony lineup at CES. Only 1 TV, x900h has HDMI 2.1. I really thought they would roll that out across their lineup this year with the PS5 coming.
I’m in the market for a 75” 4K TV. The size makes OLED too expensive and I’ve always liked Sony TVs. Bummer.
I'm also in the market for a new 55" TV but I can wait. I'm thinking of skipping OLED and waiting for micro-LED/mini-LED.
Why would anyone want to avoid an OLED?
More specifically, why would anyone want to avoid a B9/C9 with HDMI 2.1 compliance, plus G-Sync, plus a sub-13ms latency?
I've been denigrating OLED's for years and will continue to do that. To me they're the offshoot of the irrational Plasma brigade, very aggressive on the internet. Of course OLED is much better than Plasma, at least. I dont think any serious gamer should even consider OLED due to burn in, not to mention low total brightness being a big (probably OCD not reality) concern for me.
THAT said I picked up a Galaxy Tab 4 (OLED tablet) and holy cow. There is no iPad on earth that competes with that gorgeous screen. Maybe because of the increased size, it's far more impressive than my phone OLED. The colors, man the colors. They're probably just Samsung oversaturating settings, but I really dont care. Combine it with the quad speakers and wow, I'd consider dropping $600 on a S6 at this point. In a world of neat gadgets they're right at the top.
Still will denigrate the TV's though
Why would anyone want to avoid an OLED?
More specifically, why would anyone want to avoid a B9/C9 with HDMI 2.1 compliance, plus G-Sync, plus a sub-13ms latency?
Because they believe in unicorns, and believe N64 era die size will somehow get competitive with 7nm PS5 in a few years by magic. People just love slanting OLEDs and unconditionally believe in alternative technologies such as now dead on arrival EL QLEDs and “should have stayed dead in 2006” dual layer LCDs I’ve personally seen with my own eyes.