You really believe in a 2 Ghz APU? Why would Sony choose to remodel de PS5 APU, and go for a 2 Ghz solution? All of us have the notion that a product with such high speeds could have yield problems, and become more expensive and problematic than a larger GPU. Consoles can last up to 8 years, with its hardware being more and more pushed over the years, and with 90% or more of its users never cleaning the vents or replacing the thermal paste. If the thermals are so pushed at launch, how to last a generation without problems?
Why think that Sony was not aware of that? Even though they are hardware manufacturers?
At first i thought, wow 2000mhz.... it made more sense (9tf) after awhile (rdna2 efficiency, the cooling solution rumor, smaller chip then XSX, and 399 price point target, no dual sku launch, and finally BC with PS4/Pro), DF mentioning leak was PS5, Komachi etc, it's not in the realm of im-possible, with in mind how high RX series clock. It still seems high though, for a console.
Has anyone talked about the 2ghz being a boost clock of some sort? Could the PS5 boost the GPU clock for BC modes? There was mentions of it being the full chip (correct me if im wrong).
No idea, just thoughts on the gpu clock, all other things line up with the data leak from amd's test labs. Even though, the test leak doesn't tell the whole tale.
Another thing, why did Cerny (was it him), mention that PS4 games require 8TF of allegedly GCN performance, seeing the date, to be in native 4k? The Pro already being finshed for 4k, why did he mention it?
Last edited: