Or the other way
That’s conservative, PS5 gonna be 20TF i think, 3ghz gpu clock.
Baseless Next Generation Rumors with no Technical Merits [post E3 2019, pre GDC 2020] [XBSX, PS5]
- Thread starter BRiT
- Start date
- Status
Or the other way
That’s conservative, PS5 gonna be 20TF i think, 3ghz gpu clock.
Oh, didn’t see that one. That’s too bad then.
He continues to post and was not banned by Swizzle moderator
https://www.neogaf.com/threads/next...-leaks-thread.1480978/page-339#post-256230046
https://www.neogaf.com/threads/next...-leaks-thread.1480978/page-341#post-256232731
Last edited:
Neogaf mods don't ban people as quickly as before ?
I just said than flutter saying is not true for the moment at least. We need to see if he will be banned.
Nothing more.Janne Kylliö
Newcomer
They don't do (mass-)bannings in NeoGAF anymore.
AbsoluteBeginner
Regular
People are bothering so much with this stuff when we know PS5 dev kits have been very early and actual performance targets and benchmarks are in for months now. Flute, Ariel, Oberon...all codenames that are part of PS5.
As per Flute benchmark -
Zen2 stripped of some cache (as it takes most mm2 on die)
GPU - internal ID Arie clocked at 2.0GHZ (in Oberon, previos step Gonzalo from April - 1.8GHZ)
16GB of RAM on 256 bit bus (530GB/s of effective BW, could be 18Gbps chips for retail console).
We know from Komachi Oberon leak that there are 3 modes :
BC1 - 800MHZ
BC2 - 911MHZ
Base - 2.0GHZ
We know from APISAK leak that FireStrike score is ~20K. If we assume CPU is roundabout AMD 2700X in performance, then GPU part most certainly cannot be 13TF, but rather ~9-10TF, as effective bandwidth would point at as well.
IMO we should absolutely try to connect the dots of already leaked PS5 benchmarks, rather then listening to vague insiders and things they may or may not have heard. For PS5 therefore, I think we know what to expect and there will be little surprises. Sony sent first devkits back in 2018. There is 0 chance these have been anything else but GCN based.
As per Flute benchmark -
Zen2 stripped of some cache (as it takes most mm2 on die)
GPU - internal ID Arie clocked at 2.0GHZ (in Oberon, previos step Gonzalo from April - 1.8GHZ)
16GB of RAM on 256 bit bus (530GB/s of effective BW, could be 18Gbps chips for retail console).
We know from Komachi Oberon leak that there are 3 modes :
BC1 - 800MHZ
BC2 - 911MHZ
Base - 2.0GHZ
We know from APISAK leak that FireStrike score is ~20K. If we assume CPU is roundabout AMD 2700X in performance, then GPU part most certainly cannot be 13TF, but rather ~9-10TF, as effective bandwidth would point at as well.
IMO we should absolutely try to connect the dots of already leaked PS5 benchmarks, rather then listening to vague insiders and things they may or may not have heard. For PS5 therefore, I think we know what to expect and there will be little surprises. Sony sent first devkits back in 2018. There is 0 chance these have been anything else but GCN based.
If they say 13, 14, or much more it is valid though, anything lower they are lying. 15TF atleast or go home.
Wired article mentioned that there were low-speed versions of devkits.
The benchmark is likely to be one of the low-speed version rather than final silicon.
>20K, about 1700X, with 1.8ghz GPU.
AbsoluteBeginner
Regular
Maybe, but luckily we have BW figures from Flute benchmark and we are talking about ~530GB/s of effective BW. For RT equiped console, I dont think that is enough for ~13TF GPU and shared , but I may be wrong.
D
Deleted member 13524
Guest
If this is true, then both consoles are absolute monsters without any discernible visual differences in the multiplatform games, and the B3D collective should be happy about it because it would really translate into a massive upgrade compared to the current mid-gens.
D
Deleted member 13524
Guest
But it should.
The smaller the motherboard, the more space you can dedicate to copper heatpipes, heatsinks and fans.
We have really small PC cases - smaller than this - that can house full PC components.
Anyway, what's with then just having a ~5x10 mobo?
I agree, but at this point, they should have just pulled their resources together and made a common SOC to both consoles. They can still differentiate by software, but basically they are spending a lot of effort and resources to both arrive at the same solution.
Those recent Neogaf insiders are not real insiders, they are entertainers.
cheapchips
Veteran
The PS4 Slim has a motherboard about that size. Can't see XBSX needing more space for ram chips if the 16Gb rumour is true. Maybe more stepdown stuff due to higher SOC power requirements?
(XBoneX lost motherboard space to a tiny Master Chief riding a scorpion. Not quite sure what he'll be riding with the code name of Scarlett)
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
