ARM Midgard Architecture

Some more interesting comments from Jem Davies at Anandtech:

Regarding your first question, Mali-7xx supports the DX11 API. Mali-T760 supports Feature Level 11.1 and Mali-T720 supports Feature Level 9.3.

Khronos internal discussions remain confidential (Google is a Khronos member), but no, I don’t think so. I don’t believe I am breaking any confidences by saying that the feature list for OpenGL ES 3.1 was agreed by the parties in Khronos and was obviously the usual compromise between features and schedule. The OpenGL ES 3.1 API was announced as ratified back in March and I don’t think that Google have announced a firm date for the inclusion of the Android Extension Packs yet. All Mali Midgard GPUs will support both Extension Packs.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/8226/ask-the-experts-arm-fellow-jem-davies-answers-your-gpu-questions

In fact the whole Q & A with users and Jem Davies is a highly interesting read.

So T760 is feature_level DX11.1 after all, but doesn't have a ff tessellation unit; so they're probably not using a sw solution but the Midgaard programmable parts of the hw ie the ALUs?
 
Some more interesting comments from Jem Davies at Anandtech:



http://www.anandtech.com/show/8226/ask-the-experts-arm-fellow-jem-davies-answers-your-gpu-questions

In fact the whole Q & A with users and Jem Davies is a highly interesting read.

So T760 is feature_level DX11.1 after all, but doesn't have a ff tessellation unit; so they're probably not using a sw solution but the Midgaard programmable parts of the hw ie the ALUs?


they were my questions:
Q - Mali 7xx series - full DX11 compliance or not?
Q - Did Khronos drop the ball on progressing OpenGL ES and force Google to release the "extension pack"?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
they were my questions:
Q - Mali 7xx series - full DX11 compliance or not?
Q - Did Khronos drop the ball on progressing OpenGL ES and force Google to release the "extension pack"?

Good job on those; the good thing is that he's doing an excellent job despite that users have bombarded him with questions :)
 
Extensive article about the Midgard architecture at Anandtech:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/8234/arms-mali-midgard-architecture-explored

I looove it when IHVs come out in the open - at least a bit - about their architectures.

So T7xx is using after all its ALUs for generation geometry for tessellation. I understand their point why they skipped the ff tessellation unit, but I don't really know how efficienct the architecture is with geometry either.

Both the T628MP6 as the T760MP4 in the GLB2.7 (rather simple) geometry tests seem to fair quite well but that's all I know.
 
https://translate.googleusercontent...v.html&usg=ALkJrhiU79zY77Y5GJM06FERGlP9teEraQ

15fps Manhattan offscreen
22.9fps TRex offscreen

T760 scores from the 5433. Still don't know what core arrangement it is.

Looking at the MP4 scores from the Rockchip SoC you could deduce it to be an MP6 going by the Manhattan scores alone: https://gfxbench.com/device.jsp?benchmark=gfx30&D=Rockchip+rk3288&testgroup=overall. The fillrate also sort of points out to MP6.

The TRex scores are very low for some reason.

Edit: Korean sources report 17.2fps and 37.6fps. Very comparable to the Adreno 420.

http://i.imgur.com/icXZVlj.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Those are some pretty good results and if the power efficiency claims hold true, then T760 could be as popular as Mali-400/450 were.

Waiting for some performance results from the Mediatek MT6732..I expect it has a T760 MP2 configuration.
 
Those are some pretty good results and if the power efficiency claims hold true, then T760 could be as popular as Mali-400/450 were.

Waiting for some performance results from the Mediatek MT6732..I expect it has a T760 MP2 configuration.

I don't think Midgaard cores have as low die area as the Mali 4xx configs had. Other than that if that's truly a MP6 at 650 or even 700MHz yielding a bit over 17 fps in Manhattan, Apple gets roughly 10% more performance with a tad over 500MHz (estimated) from a 4 cluster config.

Unfortunately we have neither any die area or power indications for any of the 760 variants, but if there's nothing wrong with results like that: http://gfxbench.com/device.jsp?benc...i=gl&D=Samsung SM-G900x Galaxy S5 (Mali-T628)

it's predecessor throttled a helluva lot.
 
This might be the most ghetto chip breakdown ever, but also the first time ever I see a die shot of a new Mali GPU: http://www.antutu.com/view.shtml?id=7879

Includes IP block size breakdowns: http://news.mydrivers.com/picture/309044/309044_36.html

Qualcomm is killing it if the 330 is really just 16mm².

Shamelessly plugged from mboeller from another forum:

http://www.gizmochina.com/2014/10/07/hisilicon-kirin-920-tear-down/
That's the same breakdown I posted in June, you even commented on it...
 
Back
Top