They are moving to 28nm bulk for the successor of Trinity? Interesting..
what are they going to be producing on 20nm in the later half of 2012? SRAM?
If according to google, TSMC is claiming to get 20nm going in the second half of 012, why would AMD be planning a 2013 Sea Islands GPU on 28nm?
If according to google, TSMC is claiming to get 20nm going in the second half of 012, why would AMD be planning a 2013 Sea Islands GPU on 28nm?
Not sure why not. Tahiti was just a month and a half over 1 year from Cayman. And that considering it's a complete revamp of the architechture. Cayman was about a year after Cypress. Cypress about a year after Rv770 (er wait or did 4890 make cypress longer than that, don't remember and don't feel like looking it up).
So approximately one year for Sea Islands with similar arch shouldn't be odd.
AMD has been executing far better than Nvidia ever since GTX 280/Radeon 4870.
Or at least with far shorter time between products (except GTX 480->580).
Perhaps it's due to working with smaller dies. Nvidia themselves did say it was f****** hard to get a big die GPU out.
Regards,
SB
28nm, yes, but bulk isn't all that clear. I just hope they don't fall too far behind Intel.
Sure. But SOI HKMG or bulk HKMG for the Trinity successor?AMD did state at the analyst day, that 28 nm was high k metal gate across the board.
Back yet again to the topic of 28nm, an analyst tried to tease more information from the session, “I am going to try and re-ask the question on GPU 28nm to see if it’s High-k or SiON, because TSMC supplies both.” He followed that question up with an even more important one, “Your roadmap this morning laid out 28nm, in 2013 across, almost all of your products. Will you lean toward a more High-k [process], or more SiON [process], or a mix?” The answer to these two questions was both short and firm from Mr. Akrout, “Since you asked twice we are going to get you an answer. All of them are in the High-k metal gate. Across the board.”