How did you come up with barely better than 5770?
AMD: R9xx Speculation
- Thread starter Lukfi
- Start date
How did you come up with barely better than 5770?
My bad, looked at the 460 line. Still performance isnt very impressive, so I hope its fake.
since chiphell didn't even get the specs right (as far as I can see) how did they get the scores right? remember their "this slide is offical BS?
And Harison, welcome to the past.
edit: looks like the specs on the informatique site are also not correct.
It's Asus factory OC card,so core clock is a bit higher.GPU-Z shot should not be taken seriously.
So what？How about your "Juniper XT has 1120SP"?
Shader count etc. quite important, claiming to have the cards but not knowing the specs is weird.
not mine?
nice out-of-context quote there
No, I said "soon to appear here, 5770 with 1120SP" I was hinting at a new rumor where people say Juniper will have 1120SPs.
But this is turning into a personal thread again, let's talk about rv940 and how NApoleon with his "authentic slides" is wrong.
Ah, my bad, then. That was pretty ambiguous, though.
Anyway, 2 days after the press event, 6 days before the purported launch, and still no leak of official slides! Well, official slides with specifications. I don't know how AMD's doing it, but their control over information about NI is impressive.
You'll have to be very good friends to even get more than hints from some press members.
And then there's personal opinion, from "meh" to "oh wow" depending on who you ask..
Yeah, it was a typo, sorry for that.
As for the ~ 32% - that number relates to the relative increase in VantagePoints per mm² and clock (i.e. I factored in the core clocks to arrive at an even "cleaner" evaluation of the architecture itself) - so we're actually both right
Let's not.
Jawed
Legend
Lots of XFX Leakage
http://translate.googleusercontent....le.com&usg=ALkJrhjGt2iS0WnmGXzS6wVbJlqrZEyr3g
So, erm, still some dodgy clock info?
Oh and the Vapour Chamber cooler looks like it will work well.
http://translate.googleusercontent....le.com&usg=ALkJrhjGt2iS0WnmGXzS6wVbJlqrZEyr3g
So, erm, still some dodgy clock info?
Oh and the Vapour Chamber cooler looks like it will work well.
You meant 43%
Typo?Anyhow since that http://vga.zol.com.cn/199/1999757.html in their large picture gallery doesn't show up any HD6870 and they HAVE Vantage/06 results for them, wouldn''t be pretty logical to assume that HD6850 is 775M part with full shaders enabled after all and HD6870 will be 900MHz part. Probably (if they didn't fake it) they just OCed HD6850 to 900MHz clock they "were told" that HD6870 will be, even thou it would be only 16% more power in that case.
And on 725/775 HD6850 discrepancy. Aren't possible that this sample is slightly OCed part it's XFX after all and they just became exclusive ATi partner
Yes, you are right.You meant 43%
So the X-score also shown on this screen could go over 6000 points on final card.
Looks like more than the clocks are wrong.
Will the final reviews have the right info about the new cards
http://detail.zol.com.cn/picture_index_537/index5363958.shtml
Anywhere before seen the enhanced microsoft office 2010 support
What does it mean.Will the final reviews have the right info about the new cards
http://detail.zol.com.cn/picture_index_537/index5363958.shtml
Anywhere before seen the enhanced microsoft office 2010 support
Read for yourself not exactly new.
DavidGraham
Veteran
Anyone noticed "AMD Advanced Parallel Processing Technology" at the back of the box ?
Looks like better DX11 support (geometry) to me .
That could also mean the slide which mentioned RPE is right , and Barts is 1280 ALU part , Cayman is 1920 .
What is TeraScale Engine by the way ?
Similar threads
