AMD: Navi Speculation, Rumours and Discussion [2019-2020]

Status
Not open for further replies.
3dilettante said:
Although it was claimed that the VBIOS settings for many of these features were not enabled in many products. Perhaps they were intended for specific use cases and AMD neglected to mention it, or they weren't as workable or effective as the marketing stated. It might explain why AMD advertised them as new features for more than one GPU launch if it wound up not using them effectively.
Click to expand...
Agreed, it seems the first-gen Polaris didn't have such features enabled. After all it's AMD firmware, so it would make sense to be broken.
 
96 ROPs would mean either a 3 SE x 2 SA or 2 SE x 3 SA setup. The latter would work as 6 x 7 WGPs with 2 symmetrically disabled.

That would be interesting.
 
Last edited:
Rootax said:
They said the specs were incorrect. So, it lets a lot of doors open...
Click to expand...
Exactly. If it is "fake news" why not just ignore internet rumors and let the facts speak for themselves once the product is available.
 
Rootax said:
They said the specs were incorrect. So, it lets a lot of doors open...
Click to expand...
Only if you're grasping straws. Naturally SK Hynix only comments on their part of the image, but the chances that the specific part is fake and rest is real are slim to none (meaning if the GPU specs like CU counts etc are correct, it's more likely just a lucky guess than actual leak)
 
Kaotik said:
Only if you're grasping straws. Naturally SK Hynix only comments on their part of the image, but the chances that the specific part is fake and rest is real are slim to none (meaning if the GPU specs like CU counts etc are correct, it's more likely just a lucky guess than actual leak)
Click to expand...

I agree. I'm just saying, if a big navi is true (with the rumored specs), they can say "well, it was 100mhz lower so yeah we denied it !". I mean, why did they even comment on a rumor like their are a lot every day.
 
CarstenS said:
Why is this then repeated here over and over again?
Click to expand...
(Answering in the more proper thread for this)
I have no clue why it's repeated over and over again, but at least in this thread there seems to be several users pointing out quickly that it's the same fake ​
 
ToTTenTranz said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1233225281265115138
Click to expand...
it might be fake, still, there are GPUs from AMD listed for this year that are going to crush consoles so badly. The future 5900XT for instance.

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/radeon-rx-5900-xt.c3481

As I said in another thread, the naming is quite conservative or repetitive, are they maybe remembering better times when AMD GPUs ruled the world? The 5900XT existed in the mid 2000s already. (edit: my bad, it was nVidia's)

There is also a monster, the 5950XT. https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/radeon-rx-5950-xt.c3487
 
Last edited:
Cyan said:
it might be fake, still, there are GPUs from AMD listed for this year that are going to crush consoles so badly. The future 5900XT for instance.

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/radeon-rx-5900-xt.c3481

As I said in another thread, the naming is quite conservative or repetitive, are they maybe remembering better times when AMD GPUs ruled the world? The 5900XT existed in the mid 2000s already. (edit: my bad, it was nVidia's)

There is also a monster, the 5950XT. https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/radeon-rx-5950-xt.c3487
Click to expand...
TechPowerUp puts those up based on rumors, not because they are real, there's disclaimer about it on the pages "Based off of speculation/reddit and other sources online."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top