Well, I still don't like it.
And it's really obvious that this wasn't a professional journalist. Professional journalists don't write sentences like this:
"It is here were 2 things happen." (from page 2)
This is just a total lack of proofreading, and every writer should know that it is typically not acceptable to write two as a number in writing. The writer also apparently doesn't know when to use the word "where," as the same mistake was repeated later.
As for how much the pictures actually say, they really do not say much at all. Perhaps they say a bit more for people who actually work in such rooms, but they won't say much to most people. While I do like the pics of the outside and the lobby, the pics of the inner workings were just totally devoid of any explanation.
For example, I see a lot of machines in the fourth an fifth pictures on the second page, but there is no explanation as to what they actually do.
To put it another way, all that I got from this series of pictures was that the reporter went to ATI's headquarters, and that ATI has a few specific departments (prototype assembly, Q&A, etc.). This information is meaningless, and I have to wonder why it is even written. There is no purpose. For there to be any effect of these pictures, more explanation is required.