The Baron said:
As long as the case is convincingly made and proven, bias becomes not only unimportant, but invisible, IMO. Bias is most apparent when you support points you either fail to justify, or don't even attempt to justify.
Well, I don't think you'd have to do that as often many reviews simply copy the bias and errors of an earlier review done elsewhere, so that if you can trace down what you consider to be "the review" on which the others hinge, you can address most of them by addressing that review.
Stealing content = reproducing it as though you originated it
Doing a critique of a review in which the important material is your own would not be stealing material.
Actually, this kind of thing is being done and has been done for a long time. It really isn't necessary to quote someone else's review to do a critique on it--you need only restate the flawed concepts in the review you wish to rectify. Most often the material addressed by the critique need not be directly attributed for your readership to ascertain its source.
