Ok.. this is about 2010, correct? For everybody who is projecting a laughably low market share for the PS3, do you care to share with us what you believe the PRICE of the PS3 will be at the start of 2010? And what sort of gaming library it will have at the start of 2010 compared to the Wii and 360?
If the PS3 had the game library the 360 currently does, it would be flying off the shelves right now, even at its current price. Of course, it would saturate the market by the time the holidays came around and then require a price drop to open a new market.
Ok.. this is about 2010, correct? For everybody who is projecting a laughably low market share for the PS3, do you care to share with us what you believe the PRICE of the PS3 will be at the start of 2010? And what sort of gaming library it will have at the start of 2010 compared to the Wii and 360?
I don't agree with this, the price is too high. I think it would sell pretty good with 399 price tag even without games. The price simply is too high for a console, despite the added functionality, people still perceive it as a box that plays games.
By the end of 2010, the PS3 will have done all of these things and will probably be at the apex of its sales curve. While the Wii will have run out of steam entirely.
I think Wii will be in a tough spot in 2010 when the other consoles have reduced in price, and eventually PS3 will also see nice sales numbers, I don't believe it will ever reach PS2 numbers, but good numbers anyway. Nintendo will probably also have a ace in their sleeves, if and when Wii starts to lose its steam.
Confused.. it would sell at 399 without games. But not at 599 even with a game library equal to the 360?
Again, I said it would sell at 599 until the holidays.. so for about 6 months. That's what it would take for the market of a 599 console to be saturated. Then, they'd have to drop the price point because releasing more software wouldn't help.
360 doesn't sell outside of NA. Anybody wanting an audio/visual experience outside of NA will have to develop for the PS3.
I do believe the PS3 needs to reduce its price fairly soon. But it needs software exclusive IPs first to move the 'expensive' units, then it needs its 3rd party ports to come online at the same time as their competitors, then it can focus on dropping price points in order to reach a larger market.
whilst hoping the difference does not get wide enough to lose software deals...
So the only other choice is the 360, and the 360 doesn't sell outside of NA. Anybody wanting an audio/visual experience outside of NA will have to develop for the PS3.
assen said:And the Japanese developers have already thrown most of their support behind DS and Wii.
Developers aren't looking at it that way either - if anything: they see two platforms competing directly with eachother (X360/PS3) and a third platform that is offering something completely new, for a different price targeting a different market.
Which japanese developers? Care to name a few?
What developers see is one established platform they develop for, another which still has to prove itself and at most deserves a quick hacky port, and a third one which is rapidly gaining share and must be rapidly addressed in order not to miss the bandwagon.
assen said:Maybe you haven't seen Japanese sales charts recently? These are not Western titles, and not all of them are Nintendo 1st parties.
Backtracking already? You claimed that Japanese developers have already thrown most of their support behind DS and Wii - what have Japanese sales charts got to with that? What's your point and how does that prove your claim?
Japanese developers and publishers make lots of games games for the DS and Wii (as evidenced by the release lists), and they sell well (as evidenced by the sales charts). From there on, it's on a positive feedback loop. With PS3, the feedback loop is also positive, but in the opposite direction. Sony has a chance of kicking the loop into another state by releasing a ton of first-party excellent titles. I think they have a window of maybe one year starting from now; if it doesn't work, their console is dead for all practical purposes; even if they succeed, the most they will get is a chance to fight for the second place.
You are implying here that resources are shift from PS3 to the DS/Wii - I would like to see where you are drawing this connection
If Wii has ten times as many units out to the PS3 doesn't make the PS3 platform any less viable, especially if Wii is opening a new market.
Same popular opinion when the N64 was going to come out. Nintendo was gonna win (they didn't). It is very hard to accept the leader not leading anymore. Of course in this case it really is Sony's fault for pricing the system too high. I mean the PS2 was released with 0 great games yet was sold out for a really long time. It just didn't happen this way and the only discrepancy seems to be price.Honestly, I find it very hard to understand the logic behind the popular opinion that Sony will somehow "muscle through" a couple of bad years and come on top in the end. Bad market share leads to no games / crappy ports leads to bad sales leads to bad market share. Was there ever a market leader who came up from the back at the end of a generation? IMHO, PS3 either turns around in the next 12 months, or is done.
No I'm not. These resources never were allocated to the PS3 in the first place - they were dedicated to PS2 games in the last generation, and then they were sitting on the fence, waiting to see where the wind blows. I think most of them are thrown into DS, less into Wii development. Of course, I might be wrong - but this is the general feeling coming from Japan.
It's not the relative size of the PS3 install base that is/will be turning off publishers, it's the absolute size. Four-digit weekly sales in Japan isn't something that will make Japanese-market only developers' heads turn into Sony's direction.
Honestly, I find it very hard to understand the logic behind the popular opinion that Sony will somehow "muscle through" a couple of bad years and come on top in the end. Bad market share leads to no games / crappy ports leads to bad sales leads to bad market share. Was there ever a market leader who came up from the back at the end of a generation? IMHO, PS3 either turns around in the next 12 months, or is done.