Another study: Men smarter than women

Deepak

B3D Yoddha
Veteran
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1971720.cms

HOUSTON: Women all over may not like it but it has been proved that men are smarter than women.

A study of 100,000 17- to 18-year-olds on the Scholastic Assessment Test (SAT) published in the September 2006 issue of the journal Intelligence, has confirmed a surprising new finding-that men have a 4 to 5-point IQ advantage over women by adulthood.

Because girls mature faster than boys, the sex difference is masked during the school years, which explains why the sex difference was missed for 100 years.

The new study, based upon an analysis of SAT scores that correlates to IQ, appears to confirm the similar earlier research, using a different methodology, that concluded adult men have IQs 3.3 to 5 points higher than women.

It also found that the g factor--the general factor of mental ability underlay both the SAT Verbal (SAT-V) and the SAT Mathematics (SAT-M) scales with the congruence between these components greater than 0.90, and that it was the g factor that predicted student grades better than the traditionally used SAT-V and SAT-M scales.

The male and the female g factors were congruent in excess of .99, and they favoured males to an equivalent of 3.63 IQ points.

The male-female differences were present at every socioeconomic level, and across several ethnic groups.

The average male advantage was found "throughout the entire distribution of scores, in every level of family income, for every level of fathers' and of mothers' education, and for each and every one of seven ethnic groups," said J Philippe Rushton, professor of psychology at the University of Western Ontario, one of the authors of the study.

The paper's results dovetail with those from several other recently published studies showing that men--surprisingly--have a 4 to 5 IQ point advantage over women by late adolescence and early adulthood. Before that age the two sexes are equal in general intelligence.

As such, the findings overturn a 100 year consensus that men and women average the same in general mental ability.

Because girls mature faster than boys, the sex difference is masked during the school years. Since almost all the data showing an absence of sex differences were gathered on school children, this might explain why the sex difference was missed for so long.

For decades, however, psychologists have accepted that men and women differ in their test "profiles," with males averaging higher on tests of "spatial ability" and females higher on tests of "verbal ability." These differences were assumed to average out.

The authors of the study, psychologists Douglas N Jackson and J Philippe Rushton at the University of Western Ontario, conducted the study because two recent sets of observations had raised anew the question of sex differences in general intelligence.

The first was that the general factor of mental ability--g--was found to permeate all tests to a greater or lesser extent. Thus, a "spatial" test may be relatively high on g (mental rotation) or low (perceptual speed), a "verbal" test may be relatively high (reasoning) or low (fluency), as may a "memory" test be high (repeating a series in reverse order) or low (repeating a series in presented order).

More than any other factor, the test's g loading best determines a test's power to predict academic achievement, creativity, career potential, and job performance. Hence, the question of sex differences became formulated more precisely as: "Are there sex differences on the g factor?"

Another set of observations concerned the sex difference found in brain size and the relation between brain size and cognitive ability. Studies published in 1992 at the University of Western Ontario by zoologist C Davison Ankney, and also by psychologist Rushton, showed men average a 100-gram advantage over women in brain weight (and volume).

Earlier, a study of 1,261 adults, published in 1992 by zoologist C Davison Ankney, found that men's brains were about 8 percent heavier than those of women.

A 1997 study in Denmark documented that men have about 15 per cent more neurons -- the functional unit of the brain -- than women.
 
Men are smarter concerning purely technical stuff, while women win hands-down considering social intelligence/emotional stuff etc. So what's the point? It's an influence of the structures in our society, the capabilities are about equal across the board. I call crap.
 
Wrong!
The article states men are smarter than women full stop.

If you wish to refute these findings then wait for a scientist in that profession to call crap, or do it yourself by getting the required education and then spend your time refuting these findings.
 
How so? Is the scientific method fundamentally inapplicable to psychology, or is it more that psychologists are failing to apply it in an appropriate manner?

The underlined seems to be the case AFAIK. But I think there are signs of improvements - Freud for instance is nowadays almost ridiculed.
 
We are talking averages here though, folks, and I haven't seen yet whether this test was performed in all different cultures either. We may simply be guilty of giving girls more boring toys, inhibit their natural behavior by not allowing them to be 'tomboys' (playing sports - or 3D games ;) - are essential for developing spatial abilities).

And as averages go, the differences are as small as ever. Consider a group of 100 people. The smartest girl in this group is still going to be smarter than, say, 48 out of 50 of the boys. The dummest guy is still going to have about 48 girls (and 49 guys) cleverer than him in the same group.

Do you understand what I'm getting at? Even if this finding were 100% true and confirmed, in practice, we are equal. The top 1% and bottom 1% aren't going to be very relevant, and in the other 98% you have girls and guys matching equally all over the stupid-to-smart scale.

Cultural differences, meanwhile, are still the biggest differentiator.
 
Point #1. It doesn't matter what the average says. My wife is smarter than me. She can solve all the difficult teasers and IQ questions within 5 minutes in a competition. _All_ the guys in the match surrendered. So I'm kinda screwed. :D

Point #2. It still doesn't matter. And you know what I mean.
 
IQ != Intelligence. Intelligence is as much about common sense as it is about being able to solve complex maths puzzles.
 
IQ != Intelligence. Intelligence is as much about common sense as it is about being able to solve complex maths puzzles.

And IQ tests do not only include 'complex math puzzles'.

When it come to mental ability I think it's quite accurate.
 
Boys rule girls drool.
Of course sometimes both drool in the presense of each other ;)
 
what does this mean, that men should have more self-gratification because women will go through more trials and tribulations? what the fuck does this reflect?
 
The Dead summed up my feelings on the matter rather aptly:

"Let us put men and women together
and see which one is smarter.
Some say man but I say no,
women got the man like a puppet show.

It ain't me, it's the people that say
men are leading the women astray
But I say, it's the women today
smarter than the man in every way.

That's right, the women are smarter!
That's right. the women are smarter!
That's right, the women are smarter!
Smarter than the man in every way."
 
Is the scientific method fundamentally inapplicable to psychology
Yes.

When you deal with human minds, how could any scientific method be applicable? There's nothing more disorganized than the insides of our heads. If anyone was to find a corresponding Newton's law on motion and gravity in psychology, we'd undobtedly find it would only apply to one of the sexes, in a particular age group and income bracket of a certain religion, living in a subsection of a specific part of society (such as northern europe, for example).

Psychology's mostly about thinking and believing anyway, what's applicable to one person won't be to another. I don't see how that would be compatible with the general scientific method.
 
Using SAT scores for determining intelligence is about as useful as using a dirty rag to clean a window.
 
Back
Top