Don't get fooled by .... nvidia attacking Ati

radar1200gs said:
Dave, not all NV3x pipes will execute in parallel at all times - conditional branching in the pixel shaders.

Greg, again, this has nothing to do with the discussion - only a pixel quad can be executed at a time. Also not that Conditional Branching is not supported NV3x, Conditional Write Masks were, which just results in all the pixels being rendered for all branches but only the ones that result in the correct answer get displayed.
 
radar1200gs said:
FUDie said:
radar1200gs said:
My point at the time was that ATi was a liar.
You still have yet to provide proof of this.
God you fanATics crack me up. At least nVidia supporters can admit nVidia lied.

But don't mind me:

QUACK was "an unfortunate accident"
Completely irrelevant to the discussion.
ATi had a fully functioning DDR-II card before nVidia
So far you have provided no proof to the contrary.
There are no Trilinear cheats in ATi's drivers
More distraction.
and the sun shines out of ATi's corporate arse.
If you can't win... insult?

If you can't back up your claims with proof, just say so. Put up or shut up.

-FUDie
 
So what ended up happening? I assume that ATI cards all passed and are PCIe certified or whatever the thing was since otherwise their would be a huge stink. When things work out I guess no one cares eh :p .
 
Sxotty said:
So what ended up happening? I assume that ATI cards all passed and are PCIe certified or whatever the thing was since otherwise their would be a huge stink. When things work out I guess no one cares eh :p .
Can't get the same kaboom effect when it's all fine, you need something to make people go WTF or dang
 
Back
Top