HDR settings uniformity is much needed
- Thread starter RobertR1
- Start date
D
Deleted member 2197
Guest
Looks even better now.
Cynicalking
Regular
No, with the default values it looked better already, and they could be fixed by just tweaking some sliders to make it even better. Now, the new fixed default values are better than previous ones.
DavidGraham
Veteran
Linus is hugely impressed with RTX HDR for both games and videos.
Frenetic Pony
Veteran
Ok see now people enjoying it makes sense to me, didn't know there were user controls. If you've got user controls then people tend to love that. Do people ruin the intended experience for themselves way more often than not? Sure of course, but a lot of people like having a sense of control initially, or just altogether (heck maybe the game or the intent sucks, but playing around is fun). Is auto upconverting SDR to HDR actually the equivalent of having a well mastered HDR experience? No of course not it's the equivalent of exactly what it is, an auto one that just follows some set of curves, but heck if you want to play with those curves go for it.
The latest HDR standards for PC monitors are still a bit of a kludge
A lot of 'HDR' monitors still won't really be HDR.
according to this article my old 165Hz monitor wouldn't be true HDR if we take into account DisplayHDR 1.2 requirements. Static is more than fine but DCI-P3 coverage is poor.
Dell S3220DGF Review
The Dell S3220DGF is an impressive 1440p gaming monitor. It has a curved design and it doesn't take up much room, even with the support stand attached. Gaming fe...
www.rtings.com
Last edited:
DavidGraham
Veteran
More people impressed with RTX HDR.
Cappuccino
Newcomer
Whats wrong with it? I find most people’s frustration with HDR is linked to their poor quality monitors, I’ve never had an issue with game HDR.
Lol, you're talking to the wrong guy about having poor quality displays. The difference is he probably has way way way higher standards than you do.
Cynicalking
Regular
GOW 2018 default HDR settings are awful, when you correctly calibrate it the HDR image quality improves a lot. Thing is the calibration menu is not very good.
Cappuccino
Newcomer
I'm certainly not using Calman gear to compare, however many people online (professional AV reviewers) have and most people have no problems with 99% of HDR implementations. Notable exceptions were the early Starfield implementation and the early RDR2 implementation.
I would think all default HDR settings would be awful unless its reading display parameters from Windows HDR calibration (on PC I think exactly zero games do this). Since we don't have 10k nit displays (and relying on the tonemapper is fine but not optimal if we can control it, we can't for movies unless we use DV but we can for games!) we kinda need per-TV calibration. Even on Xbox (PS maybe too) very few games read from the console's calibration data.
There are two critical flaws which negatively impact the HDR in Ragnarok.
Firstly is the black crush. While they've done a great job of using 0 nits as the black floor, it's clear the grading display they used was poor with it's near black performance giving them heavily lifted blacks. Because you certainly would not see that level of black crush when grading and go "yep that's how it should look." Studios can easily hire respected calibrators in the area for display purchasing advice and calibration to avoid this simple issue. In scope of budgets, it's a rounding error so that's certainly not a viable excuse.
The second problem is the arbitrary HDR slider in game. The PQ EOTF is a set standard. There's no such thing as "oh i want my HDR to be brighter or more dull so I'll just use a slider" What's they've done is effectively make a EOTF slider to lift or lower the curve. What should be done is a nits slider which would allow a user to set number relative to their displays specular highlights, which tells the game to tone map to that and the display then outputs from there.
Both of these things aren't some wild findings or new ways to do things. It's the normal workflow for HDR grading but it's clearly missed again.
Cappuccino
Newcomer
Wow that’s really bad, I haven’t come across an implementation that bad in a while.
I don't really know much about HDR, but I feel like it's pretty obvious that with all the different implementations of various quality and various quality of monitors changing the equation that to have any sort of standard it's probably best to just use AI tone-mapped HDR.
At this point I basically just want something similar to what DLSS/FSR/XeSS are for upscaling but for HDR.. so essentially RTX HDR or Auto HDR. Something that developers can just plug in to their games and adjust to their preference. They could have different presets for various outputs which could work well depending on the classification of the display connected, as well as allowing the user to fine tune it to their liking.
At this point I basically just want something similar to what DLSS/FSR/XeSS are for upscaling but for HDR.. so essentially RTX HDR or Auto HDR. Something that developers can just plug in to their games and adjust to their preference. They could have different presets for various outputs which could work well depending on the classification of the display connected, as well as allowing the user to fine tune it to their liking.
Similar threads
