Nvidia's 3000 Series RTX GPU [3090s with different memory capacity]
- Thread starter Shortbread
- Start date
-
- Tags
- nvidia
It would be more palatable if it wasn't saddled with 10GB RAM which is insufficient even right now. I don't think enabling ROPs to allow for 12GB would be enough either. Maybe I'm expecting too much for $700 these days. Heh.
Last edited:
Are there any articles/vids comparing ultra performance vs other modes? Haven't been able to find anything.
Havent seen any sites doing tests. But somebody did a comparision in Death Stranding: https://www.resetera.com/threads/di...-reconstruction-analysis.257136/post-46688489
That's crazy. In those images ultra performance and quality don't look vastly different.
This is awesome news. I'd thought it was restricted to 8k. Damn, every game needs to support DLSS!
Yes. DLSS 2.1 now officially support VR.
In theory games that support it could run internally at 1440p which a 3080 for example could easily manage 90fps at in current bleeding edge graphics, and then DLSS that up to 2x 4k per eye.
Babel-17
Veteran
From EVGA:
During our mass production QC testing we discovered a full 6 POSCAPs solution cannot pass the real world applications testing. It took almost a week of R&D effort to find the cause and reduce the POSCAPs to 4 and add 20 MLCC caps prior to shipping production boards, this is why the EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 FTW3 series was delayed at launch.
https://forums.evga.com/m/tm.aspx?m=3095238&p=1
Jawed
Legend
ROPs are inside the GPCs now (similar to how AMD's ROPs are inside shader arrays in RDNA), so the count of ROPs is unrelated to the count of memory channels.
Last edited:
yes, if you count the boost clock as an overclock, some cards may not be stable at their advertised boost speed. Jayz recons companies will fix affected cards via a vbios update that reduces boost speed since its a cheap fix as opposed to the proper fix of replacing 1 or more poscaps with mlcc caps
That's an insanely stupid failure on the part of the card vendors. If it's legit and there's not just a batch of defective first run cards. My two replacement Pascal cards say hi.
D
Deleted member 2197
Guest
Here's one guy who did not have any problems using a quadro driver (460.20). He says it overclocks and boost perfectly above 2ghz.
He noticed the same with the new driver issued today.
Nvidia also gave a heads up regarding the new driver and stability with the new 3080.
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforc...x-3080-board-stability-new-driver-capacitors/
He noticed the same with the new driver issued today.
quick tests to try to replicate the crash reports, high mhz before temp rise for the boost be the highest possible:
full hd, boosts above 2100
rendered in game 4k, boost jumps between 2080 and 2040, no more 2100+ boost haha, again, no stability, crash problem whatsoever, but now, like print shows, perfcap hits hard as the card power consumption raised
Nvidia also gave a heads up regarding the new driver and stability with the new 3080.
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforc...x-3080-board-stability-new-driver-capacitors/
Last edited by a moderator:
It's lg firmware issue. LG has early version of firmware update available for c9 and soon for cx
D
Deleted member 2197
Guest
September 29, 2020
One aspect regarding difference between reviewers and regular consumers is that practically all reviewers test in open air bench cases with low ambient. There are 3080's going into PCs that have much poorer cooling and higher ambient temps. It can create a situation where these issues were tripping for users if it was boosting too high in relation to temps.
