More perf numbers, less 'experience' please!
AMD: Pirate Islands (R* 3** series) Speculation/Rumor Thread
- Thread starter iMacmatician
- Start date
-
- Tags
- amd
So launching next week at $650 and $550
$649 for Fury X. It won't beat the GTX 980 Ti.
Come on.... show us what a real games machine can do with Battlefront!
Hopefully it will and force prices down to realistic levels.
That was it????
EDIT: Looked worse than the version they showed on the PS4 thanks to the crappy video quality.
EDIT: Looked worse than the version they showed on the PS4 thanks to the crappy video quality.
D
Deleted member 13524
Guest
It seems I got here too late. Where can I find the full presentation?
gamervivek
Regular
With 2X perf/watt of 290X, fury nano seems to be the captain jack leak back in november.
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-captain-jack-rumor,28129.html
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-captain-jack-rumor,28129.html
Sure they can....
1) It's water cooled
2) It's HBM
3) Highest performance commands a premium... Titan X, etc...
Even it just wins buy a small margin, that's certainly enough to ask $749+ for it, IMHO. If you want others to value your brand, you have to value yourself first...
1) It's water cooled
2) It's HBM
3) Highest performance commands a premium... Titan X, etc...
Even it just wins buy a small margin, that's certainly enough to ask $749+ for it, IMHO. If you want others to value your brand, you have to value yourself first...
It might fit into the $749 price level, but then it'd compete with the 980ti hybrid water solutions.
The FuryX will be considerably more expensive to make than the GTX 980 Ti, so they can't undercut it in price. Performance will probably be very similar.
If it'd beat it, they'd ask a higher price: for the first time I can remember, AMD has a GPU that looks amazing. I think a lot of people will want to buy it just for its good looks.
If they had the best performance, you'd expect them to shout that from the roofs with fancy bar graphs...
If it'd beat it, they'd ask a higher price: for the first time I can remember, AMD has a GPU that looks amazing. I think a lot of people will want to buy it just for its good looks.
If they had the best performance, you'd expect them to shout that from the roofs with fancy bar graphs...
Im not sure that this is the production cost who really lead the the 980TI, let alone TitanX prices.
Whatever is the performance of the AMD one, equal or better, AMD could well anticipate a down in price of the Nvidia one, im not sure they want then decrease the MSRP of their gpu 2 weeks after the launch.
One could say that if it was slower, they will have priced the card under 600$ ..
But you could be right about the performance. I dont know the numbers.
Does this nano gpu really contain 8.9Billions of transistors ? that look so small.
Whatever is the performance of the AMD one, equal or better, AMD could well anticipate a down in price of the Nvidia one, im not sure they want then decrease the MSRP of their gpu 2 weeks after the launch.
One could say that if it was slower, they will have priced the card under 600$ ..
But you could be right about the performance. I dont know the numbers.
Does this nano gpu really contain 8.9Billions of transistors ? that look so small.
Last edited:
D
Deleted member 13524
Guest
Just to get this out there:
- The aircooled version of the Fury (non-X) has the same price as a regular GTX 980.
GM200-beating or not, AMD is already undercutting nVidia in the GM204's price.
- The aircooled version of the Fury (non-X) has the same price as a regular GTX 980.
GM200-beating or not, AMD is already undercutting nVidia in the GM204's price.
Citation needed...
Last edited by a moderator:
They're not available yet