Silent_Buddha
Legend
All I can think is either; 4 CUs disabled for redundancy/ yields or 4 CUs dedicated for compute?
If it was there for redundancy/yields, then it wouldn't have been mentioned.
If it truly does only have the performance of 14 CUs, that makes it closer to Durango. But then as I mentioned in the other thread, why have 18 CUs if that is the case.
I can't imagine they can "lock" 4 CUs into compute only tasks, unless it was on another package. But I'm not sure sure that would even make sense.
Or perhaps they mean that it can only efficiently use 14 CUs and hence has the performance of 14 CUs. But considering you don't do that with GPUs in general on PC or otherwise (where efficiency is never close to 100%), that wouldn't make sense either.
Regards,
SB