That's funny coming from you. Just get the hell out of here before you get banned.
I think everyone else appreciated that was the OP's personal point of view. There's no knockout title for him on XB360 based on his idea of what a knockout title is.c0_re said:"I don't think there's any XB360-exclusive knockout title but I sure know of one for the PS3."
Then stop being a fucking moron and ruin discussions!c0_re said:Please be nice your going to hurt my feelings and make me cry London-Boy, if I couldn't post on BY3d I think I would just kill myself because life just wouldnt be worth living.
Well that's obviously too much for him to grasp. He doesn't even know who Reverend is. Maybe if he did he would have read that in a different light.Shifty Geezer said:I think everyone else appreciated that was the OP's personal point of view. There's no knockout title for him on XB360 based on his idea of what a knockout title is.
It's very frustrating when everyone can only really talk about personal opinions on such matters, yet on a forum often one's required to attach IMO's and various other disclaimers. Posts can become unneccesarily long just being padded out with constant reminders of what everyone should appreciate without needing these reminders.
"There are no games worth getting on PS3" is a sweeping statement, but totally subjectve and ergo, only valid to the principles of the poster of such a statement. It could be lengthened to "IMO there are no games on PS3 that I'm interested in" to explicitly state the obvious, but that seems a waste of time.
Shifty Geezer said:I think everyone else appreciated that was the OP's personal point of view. There's no knockout title for him on XB360 based on his idea of what a knockout title is.
It's very frustrating when everyone can only really talk about personal opinions on such matters, yet on a forum often one's required to attach IMO's and various other disclaimers. Posts can become unneccesarily long just being padded out with constant reminders of what everyone should appreciate without needing these reminders.
"There are no games worth getting on PS3" is a sweeping statement, but totally subjectve and ergo, only valid to the principles of the poster of such a statement. It could be lengthened to "IMO there are no games on PS3 that I'm interested in" to explicitly state the obvious, but that seems a waste of time.
c0_re said:Becasue it's just a tottaly assnine thing to say, to say that about any of the current or next gen Consoles weather it comes from N, Sony or Microshaft makes the post starter look very bad and tottally biased\Blinded.
London-Boy I'm sorry for being a smart ass I do respect many people's(Even Shifty) opinion around here but come on, when people say sh1te like that you just get written off by more level headed poeple that see value in all the next\current gen consoles I don't care how long you ahve been here or how many posts you have.
c0_re said:I'm not defending anything if someone would have came in here and made the same topic refering to the Xbox360 and Halo 3 I would have said the same thing.
And when did I personally attack anyone, I said I was sorry for unnecessarily being a smart ass, either excpet it and move on or continue acting like a little kid. I will posts no more in this topic, sorry to shit in your corn flakes.
I must ask though, what's the purpose of this thread? Is this some kind of feel better about not being alone thing? I mean do you all ps3 early adopter wanabes just wana feel better about knowing there are many others like you in face of the 360's menace? Kinda stupid if that's so.
He used to be a big part of the site but as time went by he became less and less involved and now likes to come in and start some flame bait threadsseismologist said:Who is Reverend?
Mefisutoferesu said:It might have started out as trouble, but it didn't end up that way.
Mordecaii said:It wasn't pure luck that kept this thread decent for a while, it was the people who chose to post actually posting constructive things. It's not that difficult people, if someone posts an opinion you don't hold, nothing says you have to get defensive over it or even respond to it.
xbdestroya said:Powderkeg I see you are insistent in maintaining your position, so I'm not going to bend over backwards to argue you. Nontheless, you are commiting a fallacy by trying to lump all consumers into one of two categories, and indeed yesterday's bargain hunter can be today's early-adopter, and vice-versa. Often the 'bargain-hunting' of a console can be to play a new and fully priced game recently released, something you seem not to take into account. Would Dragon Warrior VIII not warrant a PSTwo purchase? For some it might.
But beyond that, I'm just indicating that the contrary is also true. Some of those that may eventually purchase a 360, due to an eventual title (perhaps 2006 or 2007) may not purchase one this year simply because they are not yet 'feeling it.' Not because they are not early adopters at heart - who knows maybe they'll be off early-adopting a new cell phone instead - just because even among early adopters, there sometimes needs to be a catalyst.
EDIT: By the way I don't have an issue with the 360 itself, to be sure. I think it's a fine console with some strong looking games, and I have two on pre-order for either gifts, myself, ebay or some combination thereof. My only issue is the way you discount 'last-gen' hardware that's still getting upcoming AAA game releases as being a 'non-factor.' I mean are these things for the games or aren't they?