Junkstyle said:In terms of growth/sales/market who do you guys think is going to win 2006?
MasterBaiter said:I'm with RobertR1. I'd like to see some good competition between them mainly for the sake of no one company becoming too complacent about their performance title. Just in the last year both companies have learned a farily decent lesson.... Paper launch = teh bad.
My semi-recent (last 3-4 years?) purchases of video cards has been pretty mixed. Starting with an Nvidia 4600, then an ATI 9700 Pro, next an ATI X800XT PE, and lastly an Nvidia 7800GTX. Most significant of these cards has been the 9700. Of late it seems more like a tit for tat competition these days. I'm really hoping one of the companies releases a defintive product again.
One last thing... they need to drop prices on this stuff. It's getting pretty unreasonable, and I wouldn't feel too bad if it bit them somehow.
doob said:arquitecture.
.
neliz said:Forget about pixel shaders, texture units and memory controllers... arquitecture for the win! ;
seriously...
Would a winner be decided on it's high end products? it sales volume of low end cards.. chipset business?
ATi also seems to have gained further ground in the low-to-mid-range market sector (graphics processor with integrated video memory) - seeing its share of the market moving from under 64% at the end of 2004 to almost 75% at close of play 2005.
In terms of total stand-alone graphics processors sold, it seems claimed that ATi now has the lion's share with 52% of the market compared to NVIDIA’s 45%.
As sales of XBOX 360 consoles continue to grow and shipments of Nintendo Revolution boxes and Sony HD TV sets continue (all of which feature ATi graphics products), it’s reasonably suggested that ATI will experience a further overall surge through 2006.
Mendel said:and the points I raised mean jack schitt?