http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tm...=/ap/20040330/ap_on_re_eu/serbia_war_crimes_1
This just blows my mind.
This just blows my mind.
What the hell?!
- Thread starter I.S.T.
- Start date
Oh, come on! Bill Clinton deserves his pension. He has done alot like, ..., uhmm, ... He did that..., no that wanst good, hmm. ... no not that either. Well he's done something or other.akira888 said:
later,
epic
epicstruggle said:Oh, come on! Bill Clinton deserves his pension. He has done alot like, ..., uhmm, ... He did that..., no that wanst good, hmm. ... no not that either. Well he's done something or other.akira888 said:
later,
epic
Monica!!! He did that properly...
Didnt he screw that up too? couldnt resistlondon-boy said:epicstruggle said:Oh, come on! Bill Clinton deserves his pension. He has done alot like, ..., uhmm, ... He did that..., no that wanst good, hmm. ... no not that either. Well he's done something or other.akira888 said:
later,
epic
Monica!!! He did that properly...
later,
epic
epicstruggle said:
Depending on point of views really, on could say SHE screwed him up properly!
L233 said:AFAIK Bill didn't screw her at all
Oh please... I'm sure either his cigar got used well enough wither way... *shivers*
zurich said:
But the reason the Balkans are so screwed up is due to the legacy of brutal Ottoman Turkish occupation for 500 years. Note that the only places in the Balkans that have experienced communal violence over the last 15 years are areas where Muslims colonized during the "Turcokratia" period - Serbia, Albania, Bosnia, Croatia. Most of the Balkan Peninsula is peaceful - Greece, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia, Montenegro, Hungary, etc.
Widespread communal violence is common whenever a colonist people has violently displaced an indigenous one for living space - Western Balkans, Asia Minor (Turkey), Rep. of South Africa, Cyprus, USA, Canada, North Africa/Meghreb, Karabagh. This is more of a colonialism phenomenon than a Balkan one.
akira888 said:
What makes Clinton a "war criminal"? Just curious.
John Reynolds said:
There's almost certainly enough justification to indict all Presidents of the modern era on war crimes charges.
As for Mr. Clinton, my beef is the rapacious destruction of Belgrade in 1999 when Serbia had not attacked the US or was in an imminent position of doing so. That was no different than the Iraq adventure really - of whatever risk Iraq was Serbia was a small fraction of that. And it's funny how Clinton (or Bush FTM) never cared much about the Kurds in Turkish occupied Kurdistan - in fact he sold them out by turning Kurdistan President-in-exile Abdullah Ocalan over to Ankyra.
Dont forget he bombed a aspirin factory, he thought it was a place that made chemical weapons. I believe a few people died. If you fault Bush for bad intelligence, you must equally fault clinton.John Reynolds said:
later,
epic
Yes I do, since both were given bad intel. What if the factory bombing was what pushed the terrorist over the edge???Ty said:
later,
epic
[quote="epicstruggleYes I do, since both were given bad intel. [/quote]
The difference: Clinton was given bad intel, Bush and his cronies manufactured the bad intel via the OSP.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,999737,00.html
This was news a year ago... but I guess politicians can always rely on the public's short memory.
The difference: Clinton was given bad intel, Bush and his cronies manufactured the bad intel via the OSP.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,999737,00.html
This was news a year ago... but I guess politicians can always rely on the public's short memory.
Maybe im mistaken, but clinton(UN, UK, Italy, et al) also thought that iraq had WMD's, but I guess it was all a big conspiracy so that in the event that bush was elected president he could go to war with iraq. Yeah, thats it the neo-cons have been planning this for over 10 years.L233 said:
later,
epic
edit fixed quote problem
