I'm primarily upgrading my computer to play games with. I have a ATI Radeon 4870 512MB video card, and my monitor only supports 1680x1050 resolution so obviously I don't need as much graphics muscle as some people would. I currently have a Core 2 E6600 running on a low-end Gigabyte 965P Intel chipset with fairly low-end OCZ 800 DDR2 memory. Unfortunately I can't overclock this system very high due to the low-end motherboard and memory.
I have two upgrade paths I can take:
Intel i7 920
Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R
G.Skill 6GB 1600 DDR3 8-8-8-21
-or-
AMD Phenom II X4 940
GIGABYTE GA-MA790GP-UD4H
CORSAIR DOMINATOR 4GB 1066 DDR2 5-5-5-15
Another ATI Radeon 4870 512MB
So my question is, for 1680x1050 gaming, would I be better off going with the Phenom II and having less CPU power but having greater graphics power, or should I get the Core i7 and have higher CPU power but lower graphics power (at least for a while, I could still add a second 4870 but it would take at least 4-6 months)?
Edit: I forgot to mention, the Q9550 is also an option, but I didn't think it would provide a big enough boost over the Phenom 940, especially for an extra $50 or so, to warrant purchasing it since both would have the extra 4870 if I went that route.
I have two upgrade paths I can take:
Intel i7 920
Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R
G.Skill 6GB 1600 DDR3 8-8-8-21
-or-
AMD Phenom II X4 940
GIGABYTE GA-MA790GP-UD4H
CORSAIR DOMINATOR 4GB 1066 DDR2 5-5-5-15
Another ATI Radeon 4870 512MB
So my question is, for 1680x1050 gaming, would I be better off going with the Phenom II and having less CPU power but having greater graphics power, or should I get the Core i7 and have higher CPU power but lower graphics power (at least for a while, I could still add a second 4870 but it would take at least 4-6 months)?
Edit: I forgot to mention, the Q9550 is also an option, but I didn't think it would provide a big enough boost over the Phenom 940, especially for an extra $50 or so, to warrant purchasing it since both would have the extra 4870 if I went that route.