epicstruggle said:next project is a laptop picture frame. Trying to get the parts now.Fox5 said:Use ethernet to hack that dreamcast instead!
epic
You could get a PDA with VGA out.
epicstruggle said:next project is a laptop picture frame. Trying to get the parts now.Fox5 said:Use ethernet to hack that dreamcast instead!
epic
oddfellow said:Definately dump it.
It would save me the bother of disabling them in the bios anyway.
Also, I agree with the previous posts about dumping PS2 ports in favour of USB ones. If everyone had to do it, bios support for USB keyboards would have to be implemented properly and there wouldn't be a problem.
Plus, aren't the PS2 ports connected to the antiquated ISA bus??
Surely it's about time that was dumped.
arrrse said:Yup, I vote to keep legacy.
The reason its still there is because it hardly costs anything & it saves loads of trouble from users complaining that they can't get <old device x> to work/can't even find anywhere to plug it into.
Floppy drive controllers/winxp/mobo bioses still contain legacy support for 5.25 inch drives for example.
Oh, & there's a legacy I'd really like to see Nvidia bring out: 3dFx.
I'm sure it would make for a fairly tiny chip at 110nm.
Mind you, Zeckensacks' Glide Wrapper kinda makes it a moot point.
The serial port is still used by people to interface specialistic hardware. I guess the question is whether it should still be supported for the small minority of people that still use it or not?
Phantom69 said:And serial ports are still used to connect up diagnostic hardware for POST errors, etc. The serial port is still used by people to interface specialistic hardware. I guess the question is whether it should still be supported for the small minority of people that still use it or not?
Fox5 said:The serial port is still used by people to interface specialistic hardware. I guess the question is whether it should still be supported for the small minority of people that still use it or not?
Well it's not like all computers would instantly lose their outdated ports, those people can keep their old equipment with their old computers. For new computers they'll have to buy USB hardware or things to convert their old hardware to USB.
Wtf, you can keep an old POS PC so you can have your precious serial ports, nobody ACTUALLY needs serial ports for anything anymore. Death to all that legacy sh!t, serial, parallel, ps/2, floppy. Death to all of it. There's USB-to-serial adapters to be had if it's absolutely needed.epicstruggle said:doing it over USB was a lot more complicated. Long live serial.
Yup.Huh, what? What do you want nvidia to do with 3dfx? Produce an old 3dfx chip(which I don't think nvidia bought the rights to), shrink it down, and put it on a future nvidia card?
For one, it takes up precious space on the back panel that could house more USB ports instead, thus not making USB ports take up extra slot place, which is a must if we're ever to move away from bulkish full ATX designs. Also, it's generally better to have only the absolute necessary amount of different bus protocols in any given system design (on a similar note, I'd oust FDD support from future chipsets as well).epicstruggle said:How is it bothering anyone if they keep the legacy stuff?
epic
anaqer said:For one, it takes up precious space on the back panel that could house more USB ports instead, thus not making USB ports take up extra slot place, which is a must if we're ever to move away from bulkish full ATX designs. Also, it's generally better to have only the absolute necessary amount of different bus protocols in any given system design (on a similar note, I'd oust FDD support from future chipsets as well).epicstruggle said:How is it bothering anyone if they keep the legacy stuff?
epic
[rude]
NEED LEGACY PORTS? USE AN OLDER COMPUTER.
EOD.
[/rude]
I don't think so. Even USB2LAN seems to work fine without any sort of support from the chipset, so I can't see why, say, a serial connection couldn't be emulated via driver.Fox5 said:Wouldn't dropping support in the chipset for a certain type of connection the things like serial to USB connectors not work?
First, take a chill pill. Then take another, cool off.anaqer said:For one, it takes up precious space on the back panel that could house more USB ports instead, thus not making USB ports take up extra slot place, which is a must if we're ever to move away from bulkish full ATX designs. Also, it's generally better to have only the absolute necessary amount of different bus protocols in any given system design (on a similar note, I'd oust FDD support from future chipsets as well).epicstruggle said:How is it bothering anyone if they keep the legacy stuff?
epic
[rude]
NEED LEGACY PORTS? USE AN OLDER COMPUTER.
EOD.
[/rude]
DaveBaumann said:Yes, I'd like to see FDD's gone as well. I think this is another area where BIOS and motherboard manufacturers need to brush up a little as wel though - we need to ensure that people can effectively boot from a USB key drive.
--Implement an area on the motherboard where you could download a new bios, or someother piece of software and then be able to install it. I no longer use a floppy and also would like to see its real estate on the motherboard gone. I hope what I said makes abit of sense, basically this bit of ram/rom on the motherboard could be like a drive when using your OS of choice. If not how about providing a usb storage device, and making the sff able to boot of of it.
One would think those tags should have prevented such misunderstandings. :?epicstruggle said:First, take a chill pill. Then take another, cool off.
source please.anaqer said:it just boggles the mind why we HAVE to live with (and pay for) features that are superfluous for 90% of the population.epicstruggle said:First, take a chill pill. Then take another, cool off.