zidane1strife
Banned
If I use logic and mathematics to peer into the future, it would seem that there is neither an end in sight*(ok, there's an end in sight for its time in the spotlight... queue ps4...), nor a way to stop people from making ps3 games and ps3 systems. Eventually the design will leak out and fans will keep it alive somehow, through emus and even through indefinite h/w repair(queue nanotechnology.).
So what exactly limits how good looking ps3 games can get? Isn't it the efficiency of the algos, software side of the equation that helps determine it too, but if it is kept indefinitely alive after an indefinite number of years won't the games just keep getting better and better looking until it is practically indistinguishable from reality?
How then could one do to accel the advent of more and more and ever more efficient algos for ps3 programmers, inspiring them? Giving or Helping them find the algos? There has to be a path of least resistance that maximizes their output in the least amount of time possible, the most efficient path theoretically and logically possible.
Is it like the math community, that is sharing and defending one's passionate works of arts for free and as discoveries maximizes efficiency in computer science too, or is the path somehow different from that followed by mathematicians. Wherein lies the difference such that passion towards their work increases forever more and the workflow is made into ever more sublime ecstasy.
Again I'm trying to use recombinatorial logic in real life to see if there's a way, be it changes to work space, inspirational ideas, blessings, favors, faith, something or nothing to give from time to time or for them to take from time to time to keep them like wild hounds searching for the ideal paths toward ideal solutions and thus giving us unreal looking games in the least amount of time and through the least amount of work possible.
So what exactly limits how good looking ps3 games can get? Isn't it the efficiency of the algos, software side of the equation that helps determine it too, but if it is kept indefinitely alive after an indefinite number of years won't the games just keep getting better and better looking until it is practically indistinguishable from reality?
How then could one do to accel the advent of more and more and ever more efficient algos for ps3 programmers, inspiring them? Giving or Helping them find the algos? There has to be a path of least resistance that maximizes their output in the least amount of time possible, the most efficient path theoretically and logically possible.
Is it like the math community, that is sharing and defending one's passionate works of arts for free and as discoveries maximizes efficiency in computer science too, or is the path somehow different from that followed by mathematicians. Wherein lies the difference such that passion towards their work increases forever more and the workflow is made into ever more sublime ecstasy.
Again I'm trying to use recombinatorial logic in real life to see if there's a way, be it changes to work space, inspirational ideas, blessings, favors, faith, something or nothing to give from time to time or for them to take from time to time to keep them like wild hounds searching for the ideal paths toward ideal solutions and thus giving us unreal looking games in the least amount of time and through the least amount of work possible.
