RenegadeRocks
Legend
BTW, no pre order for me anywhere sold out everywhere in our area ! Well, good for them, congrats CDPR, bad for me. Will have to hunt on launch day !
Meh.
How is anyone supposed to make an informed choice like that.
I would have preferred to see the events of previous Witcher maybe even in a short comic and then decide based on what I saw.
I should have known something was wrong when I also got confused after watching the video. As I said I have both The Witcher previous titles, and from the little I played The Witcher 2 -barely played TW2 'cos my computer couldn't run it when I purchased it and the X360 version was given for free quite recently as part of XBL games with gold, but I am into the XO now and barely touch the360-, I still prefer the first The Witcher very much, it was surprisingly good. I have good memories of that game. Plus I found the great GoG after purchasing it.how the hell can anyone know anything about these choices and what they mean for Witcher 3 ??!?!?! WTH
Nice, food for thought, I will see what book to get first, I am thankful. I am going to binge on mysteries and tradition this summer, and while I have plenty to choose from on my own bookshelves, I can never resist the temptation of the new.Anyone interested in the books should read stories first, as they set background for the saga. First part "Last wish" is availabe and second part "Sword of destiny" is due to be relased in May this year by Gollancz. Then there is the saga, which except for the last parts has been released in english, but there is a fan translation of missing parts. And then there "Season of storms" which has been released fairy recently and takes place somewhere between the short stories. I recommend to read it last, only if you finished saga and still want more
I think you are seeing things that aren't there . The vampire said that in the past times no amount of coin would have convinced a witcher to take this contract, while the background music turns more menacing. It clearly portraits that this is so due to the threat level she poses. Geralt however is willing to be different and take on this threat. There really is no regret or remorse from Geralt there as far as I can see, not much anyway and Geralt didn't say anything about not taking this contract in the past.
Vampire: <singing>
Geralt: Nice Tune (in conversational tone), been awhile since I've heard it last (friendly tone).
Vampire: Folk have forgotten it (matter of fact tone).
Geralt: Got (pause), other things on their mind.
Vampire: Things like me (sad lilt at the end).
Geralt: (sad sigh) They paid me for you (regret).
Vampire: (small laugh) Times past no amount of coin would convince a witcher to take this contract (menacing tone halfway through sentence as combat is now inevitable)
Geralt: Times have changed (steeled resolve now that combat is imminent).
You are such a geek.Sure as I've said, that's one way of looking at it...
But the whole thing leading up to the fight.
Code:Vampire: <singing> Geralt: Nice Tune (in conversational tone), been awhile since I've heard it last (friendly tone). Vampire: Folk have forgotten it (matter of fact tone). Geralt: Got (pause), other things on their mind. Vampire: Things like me (sad lilt at the end). Geralt: (sad sigh) They paid me for you (regret). Vampire: (small laugh) Times past no amount of coin would convince a witcher to take this contract (menacing tone halfway through sentence as combat is now inevitable) Geralt: Times have changed (steeled resolve now that combat is imminent).
As mentioned before, Witchers, including Geralt have killed Vampires in the past. What makes taking this contract different than ones before? Yes, not all Witchers would have taken on the contract, because not all Witchers have the same level of skill and power. But Geralt isn't the only Witcher to have killed vampires in the past. IIRC Geralt isn't even the most powerful Witcher to have existed.
So, yeah like many good films, it's open to interpretation. To me, there's obviously regret over this. But Geralt isn't going to allow that to distract him and get him killed. Likewise the vampire feels sadness at what is to come, but steels herself against it in order to try to win.
Regards,
SB
As mentioned before, Witchers, including Geralt have killed Vampires in the past. What makes taking this contract different than ones before? Yes, not all Witchers would have taken on the contract, because not all Witchers have the same level of skill and power. But Geralt isn't the only Witcher to have killed vampires in the past. IIRC Geralt isn't even the most powerful Witcher to have existed.
So, yeah like many good films, it's open to interpretation. To me, there's obviously regret over this. But Geralt isn't going to allow that to distract him and get him killed. Likewise the vampire feels sadness at what is to come, but steels herself against it in order to try to win.
Gamersyde put a livestream last night [it's available for streaming now]. They've shown both Xbone and PS4 version of the game, and talked at length how Xbone has constant framerate issues. Xbone>PS4 switch happens at around 16min mark.
Gamersyde put a livestream last night [it's available for streaming now]. They've shown both Xbone and PS4 version of the game, and talked at length how Xbone has constant framerate issues. Xbone>PS4 switch happens at around 16min mark.
I'm watching this video and it's at the start, 2:48 in and the chap is saying, "Because as you can see, the Xbox One version, while at least so far, no problem. It's not smooth at all." And I'm thinking, what are you talking about!?! It's fine. I believe all the framerate criticism on console versions but not only does it not bother me but I have to really concentrate to spot it.
Tearing on the other hand, zero tolerance.
whats 5k ?PC 5k images
5K monitor - there are plenty about and the first appeared last year. 4K is so 2013whats 5k ?
Whats with the moire effect on the sunlight?
whats 5k ?
ps: there's already a mod out for pc which tones down the over saturated look
Wowza!