Such hyperbolic statements never lead to anything good. I think we all know that by now.
We have some threads about it around here. Traditionally It does forward rendering and computes and extra step called a depth pass or something which causes geometry to be run twice. After that step it breaks the whole screen up into tiles IIRC and performs lighting like a tiled based solution. So instead of incurring a penalty on memory footprint, it incurs it on double geometry. Forza Horizon 2 uses clustered link lists on the lights to bypass the depth buffer, but not sure how that may have impacted other features down the line. I guess we'll have to wait to see forza 6 to find out.
More like a Fiat 500. Cheap and easy.
Surely we're all capable of interpreting a hyperbolic statement as a personal impression about the graphics.
Interesting that The Order 1886 is only £49.99 on the UK PSN Store, which is £5 less then most new full priced games.
Does anybody know the install size? Usually this is visible as part of the information for digital game purchases but it's strangely absent from the PSN Store.
Thanks. I guess I shouldn't be surprised!
You can pry my bluray off my cold dead hands !!!
Except it's not worded as such. It's presented as a objective quality of the game rather than subjective preference.
The number of people who believe something has no relevance on how reasonable that belief is.
Quinicunx AA was a factor indeed, but it's no secret that it also uses a heavy amount of motion blur. Interesting that you mention the CGI video since that one didn't have any motion blur at all. Not even camera-based.
