Thomas Poole, Amateur Historian and Psychologist
Answered Nov 9, 2018 · Author has 176 answers and 89.6k answer views
The most annoying thing for most fans is that it doubles down on all of the things that have made so many potentially good films and shows go so wrong in the past two or so years.
A Female Lead (Because Diversity y’all): I think Jodie Whittaker is actually not a bad choice for the Doctor I think her character is a bit too much Tennant/Smith lite and the costume is a bit naff but She’s done pretty well and I think those shortcomings are more down to the writers than anything else. I actually think that a lot of complaints about most female leads recently (Being a Mary Sue, doesn’t need help from anybody, no flaws at all) actually make the Doctor a pretty good role for a woman. The Doctor is meant to be hyper intelligent, competent and adaptable, you can’t just complain about the Doctor being overpowered because honestly, that’s the Doctor’s whole schtick. That being said, it’s obvious to anyone with half a brain that they went with a female lead because diversity. We didn’t need a female doctor, it wasn’t necessary and to be frank, the Doctor is probably best left male. Those who complain about the lack of female leads generally also want to stop young boys being exposed to so many macho, gung ho action man male leads. In comparison the Doctor runs away, is a pacifist, uses his intelligence, empathy and diplomacy to solve problems and forgives genocidal maniacs who killed his people. He’s probably the best role model for young boys out there and making the Doctor a woman doesn’t really bring anything to the character.
A Diverse cast (Because we need dark skin and women to not be racist): I don’t mind having a diverse cast per se but the reasons for it have to be related to telling the story and not just for the sake of diversity. I would prefer that instead of focusing on hiring actors for their skin colour or including disabilities or cancer just for those extra diversity points that they write characters with greater diversity of thought and then hire whichever actor best suits the role. The main point of Doctor who is to tell morality tales and explore current issues or potential future issues in a way that is entertaining and not overly taxing or preachy. Focusing on the way characters think and how they agree or conflict with the Doctor (and indeed the villain) makes for a far better story. It would be far more interesting to have someone with High Functioning Autism or a properly written Psychopath be a companion and see how they deal with conflicts and ethical conundrums. On a positive note I think Yaz actually has great potential in this respect. Despite being unable to stop seeing and hearing Constable Habeeb from ‘The Thin Blue Line’ whenever she’s on screen I think that, properly handled, her idealism and stubbornness could be written into some interesting interactions and conflicts with the Doctor and the other companions.
Over the top political commentary: Leading on from the point above Doctor who is about introducing ideas and making you think about various solutions. What it shouldn’t be is blatant, beating you over the head with a hint hammer levels of obvious. The straight white man bashing is tiresome and ridiculous. Yes, we know Trump’s mean but are you seriously so unimaginative as to make a blindingly obvious facsimile of him a villain. One good episode that demonstrates how to properly handle ethical issues is when the Doctor and Donna first encounter the Ood. Donna isn’t a black woman relating to the slaves because she’s black, she’s someone who enjoys and takes her freedom for granted being confronted with the idea that a so called advanced civilisation could lobotomise and sell off intelligent and gentle beings. The message is clear but it’s presented in a way that makes it a watchable and enjoyable sci-fi show.
Bad/pandering writers: Whatever your opinion of Broadchurch Chibnall is a bad writer for Doctor Who. He doesn’t get what the fans want, how to pace a Who script or have the range to deal with the fact that Doctor Who can be pure sci-fi on week, a tragedy the next and pure horror the week after (Two excellent Horror episodes being Blink and Midnight, compare that with Chibnall’s giant spiders). Chibnall also seems perfectly happy to just go along with everything listed above that annoys the fans and not do anything different.
I think at this point people have accepted that this is the cast we’re going to have and don’t really dislike them that much as characters, they just want good episodes, interesting writing and less attempted political indoctrination