not because of what happened, per se, but because of the way it was developed.
- First, what
@hoom said about the dragon and the scorpions. Daenerys had three dragons but wasn't able to do before what she eventually did now with only one, even though the city and the fleet were covered in scorpions?
- Tyrion gives away Varys for treason, and just after before that he himself betrays Daenerys AND not only to help his brother, but to help his bitch of a sister, telling Jaime to 'convince' her about surrendering/going away. What else does he need to know his sister?
- Daenerys going mad is horrible, but it was expectable. In fact, before that I was saying that she was just about to go crazy. BUT heck, if you go all Nero, why do you burn the city first and then a bit of the Red Keep, and after that, the city again? She gave Cersei, her supposedly worst enemy, plenty of time to escape while she burnt the city to the ground. I felt that Cersei died by chance or accident rather than because of Daenerys direct action.
- And again, Jon's stupid and artificial (it hasn't been well developed, at all...) devotion to 'his queen'. How did this happen?? He was all for the north, and one or two episodes with Daenerys and boom! He's madly in love with her, loyal to his new queen. A queen that was able to give the Iron Islands back to their rulers, but that was not able to do the same with the north, even though they had a similar claim and were far more important in Westeros, overall. Jon being weak and not listening to Sansa... that could be valid, but the way it happened was crap.
I've enjoyed previous episodes that were highly criticised by the audience, but this one... this one was pure crap, even though it was spectacular and whatever.