Speed force makes more sense than silly radioactive spiders.
Never mind relativity.
Never mind relativity.
He's spun a web onto a moving crane that's presumably moving to the left thus the locomotion would have changed the trajectoryAhhh! He shoots his web to the right and then swings to the left! What's he using to change his trajectory against gravity? Massive farts??
It's a free-flowing flexible web. Doesn't matter how the crane would be moving; gravity and his existing momentum would be the only forces acting on him.He's spun a web onto a moving crane that's presumably moving to the left thus the locomotion would have changed the trajectory
It's a free-flowing flexible web. Doesn't matter how the crane would be moving; gravity and his existing momentum would be the only forces acting on him.
As for it being okay to break the laws of physics, there's no problem at all. The issue is when things aren't explained or ignored. You can have whatever rules you want in a fantasy, but they need to work and be applied. If Spidey can defy the laws of physics, it should be explained how. Either that or he should operate within the default laws of physics, and just change the way he uses his web so he does more pulling and pushing and jumping to keep moving the right way, also accounting those limits into how well he can or can't pursue someone.
The one that kills me most is the Ant Man film. He shrinks small enough to fit between the atoms of the whatever-it-was to smash it from the inside. Well, he'd have been too small to do anything. He'd have passed harmless through the atoms on the inside as well. The writers glossed over that and made the conclusion a nonsense when they could have just tweaked the resolution so there were no gaping holes. I don't know if writers are just lazy or ill-educated.
[+1 vote for Off Topic]
I don't know if writers are just lazy or ill-educated.
[+1 vote for Off Topic]
Except at that point Spidey's momentum was moving forward and what happens when a forward moving object gets intercepted by a side moving force? The said object moves in the same direction as the intercepting force assuming the force is stronger than the object.It's a free-flowing flexible web. Doesn't matter how the crane would be moving; gravity and his existing momentum would be the only forces acting on him.
[+1 vote for Off Topic]
It's actually an interesting point for the game. How do they handle the physics when they can't rely on conventional physics engines and normal rope physics? I'm guessing they work out a curve path and send the web somewhere relative to that. Will be very interesting if there's a photo mode where you can look at exactly where the web is fixed. Well, mildly interesting. Actually, not interesting. No-one cares. I'll get my coat...
Ahhh! He shoots his web to the right and then swings to the left! What's he using to change his trajectory against gravity? Massive farts??
Hope they won't overdo it with the QTEs.
this is the game I liked the most in Sony's conference, I think I have a friend or two who wouldn't mind to get a PS4 just for this game --they are PC gamers.playstation title I'm most looking forward to seeing.
this is the game I liked the most in Sony's conference, I think I have a friend or two who wouldn't mind to get a PS4 just for this game --they are PC gamers.