Sixaxis honoured with Emmy?

Status
Not open for further replies.
as Scooby said

this makes more sense also as to WHY they and Nintendo would win an Emmy for hardware.

It represents the pop cultural TV icons of Game Pad evolution ....I guess. :)

Séamus at Hydrapinion did some legwork and discovered that, while Sony had won an Emmy for Technology and Engineering, it wasn't for the SIXAXIS. Instead, Christine Chin from NATAS confirmed that Sony's Dual Shock as well as Nintendo's D-Pad (NES pad?) won "for the development of the generation of controllers that followed the classic joysticks." Oops! You know what they say happens when you assume ...
 
Sony wins an award.. Obviously they MUST have bought it.
*Sigh*

Peace.

People question sony's award... they MUST be sony-haters!

The problem was that it was worded such that the SIXAXIS controller, which isn't revolutionary in any way whatsoever, received an award. For what? For technology SONY all but ripped straight out of Nintendo's R&D? For removing rumble? For packing a 3 foot USB cable in a $600 package for a controller that doesn't last as long as a pair of AA batteries? For using the exact same outward design as their prior two controllers?
 
Heh

Why does these PR blunders always happen to Sony? I'm starting to think its actually on purpose :S

Oh, btw i checked out The Emmy winners and turns out Microsoft won something for best media streaming and for
"The Emmy Award for Pioneering Work in Near and Real-Time Fully Programmable Shading Via Modern Graphics Processors"- (i don't know why i mentioned it, but its just such a silly name for an award and i kinda like saying it :p)
Does anybody got any suggestion to what that award would be if we weasel it into Sony PR talk?
 
People question sony's award... they MUST be sony-haters!
What's there to question? They got an award.

That you or others may feel it was undeserved (I might well agree) or that Sony put PR spin to it is rather irrelevant actually.

That people constantly rag on sSony for every single reason imaginable - and even some that aren't - gets old however. Real fast.

Peace.
 
What's there to question? They got an award.

But it wasn't for Sixaxis.

I understand you had contacted Cheryl Daly, Director of Communications at NATAS to confirm if Sony won for their PS3 controller. This is incorrect, Sony won for their dual shock analog controller. The award is from the Video Game Technology Group. It was nominated by our internal group and considered along with the Nintendo D-Pad both of which were considered Emmy worthy for the development of the generation of controllers that followed the classic joysticks.

I would like to confirm that Sony did not win for their PS3 controller, they won for their Dual Shock Analog controller.
 
What's there to question? They got an award.

As it has already been pointed out to you, the award wasnt for Six-axis.


That you or others may feel it was undeserved (I might well agree) or that Sony put PR spin to it is rather irrelevant actually.

That people constantly rag on sSony for every single reason imaginable - and even some that aren't - gets old however. Real fast.

You dont see why people ragged on Sony for this one?

What Sony PR initialy managed to tell people was that the award was for the Six-Axis. Now there is a competitor out there, with a controlling scheme that not only is better, but its also more advanced and can do anything that the Six-axis can do. But for some reason, Sony still won that award, despite of having a worse product.

Thats like, Nintendo winning an award for "Best next-gen graphics", even thought you can say that graphics, like controllers are very subjective, anybody who is not a Nintendo ****** will feel that the award was unfair and that there was something dirty that went down.

Why you try to defend Sony in this particular thread, is beyond me.
 
Thats like, Nintendo winning an award for "Best next-gen graphics", even thought you can say that graphics, like controllers are very subjective, anybody who is not a Nintendo ****** will feel that the award was unfair and that there was something dirty that went down.

Why you try to defend Sony in this particular thread, is beyond me.
The difference is, they didn't say it wasn't for antything "best", or did they?

You just can't do PR these days, especially if you're Sony :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ouch, looks like SONY's been busted! It appears the emmy was actually for the old duel shock controller, and has absolutely nothing to do with the sixaxis!
http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=71647

"I would like to confirm that Sony did not win for their PS3 controller, they won for their Dual Shock Analog controller," the NATAS representative concluded. Somewhat at odds, then, with Monday's press release: "Sony Computer Entertainment America Wins Emmy Award for PLAYSTATION 3 SIXAXIS Wireless Controller," where SCEA president and CEO Jack Tretton attributed his company's fictional success to "overwhelming consumer demand and critical acclaim".
 
isnt there the possibility of error rather than just lying PR?

If it was, they should get a new PR team :LOL: these people are paid to put across the company, if they can't get that right then they shouldn't be in PR. Either way you look at it - lying, an error, it still looks bad now
 
If it was, they should get a new PR team :LOL: these people are paid to put across the company, if they can't get that right then they shouldn't be in PR. Either way you look at it - lying, an error, it still looks bad now

Well they still won an award......Nintendo too.....but certaintly not for Wii either :p
 
What Sony PR initialy managed to tell people was that the award was for the Six-Axis. Now there is a competitor out there, with a controlling scheme that not only is better
Different, not better. Better is subjective and varies from application to application
but its also more advanced and can do anything that the Six-axis can do.
Not necessarily true. It's right to say the Wiimote can do things sixaxis can't, but we don't know for sure that it can do everything sixaxis can. In fact obviously it can't, because with Wiimote you can't apply motion + two analogue stick simultaneously. On the movement side, we don't know how sensitivity is between devices either, which may see sixaxis managing to outperform Wiimote in non-direct-pointing situations.
But for some reason, Sony still won that award, despite of having a worse product.
Again, worse is a poor choice of word. I'd say the Wiimote should definitely trump the sixaxis for innovation, but I wouldn't say sixaxis was a worse controller. Such a statement would be utterly subjective. And as this award wasn't for innovation in a next-gen controller, it's not surprising Nintendo didn't get it ;)

Why you try to defend Sony in this particular thread, is beyond me.
One reason to defend Sony is to at least blame them for the right crime! There was a fair bit of excusing Nintendo (they don't show at CES so wont get any awards) and saying the award was bought with some old fashioned bribery and corruption. The truth was that both Sony and Nintendo got awards (so ya-boo-sucks to those who excused Nintendo with that idea ;)) but the awards wasn't for sixaxis.
 
As it has already been pointed out to you, the award wasnt for Six-axis.
I knew that already before I even entered the thread but thanks for reiterating already common knowledge I guess.

My point was however that just because they won an award (for whatever reason) doesn't mean they bribed themselves to it. Which is what some of the initial posters suggested.

Don't try and twist my post into a point I never argued thanks again.

You dont see why people ragged on Sony for this one?
I see a PR department doing..well what PR departments do. It's all pretty much the same really no matter which large corporaton you look at.

I can't be bothered to get outraged or even upset over something as small and insignificant about sony winning an award for their dual shock and spinning it into an award for the sixaxis. Especially as the two products are practically the same thing anyway with some fairly minor differences. UIf you squint a bit and don't look too closely sixaxis looks very close to the original dual sticks pad released for the original playstation.

On the grand scheme of things this "scandal" is maybe three feathers.. and three thousand feathers short of a hen.

Why you try to defend Sony in this particular thread, is beyond me.
What makes you think I'm defending anything. I'm just tired of people slamming sony left and right for baseless reasons (the bribery accusation).

I can state an opinoon can't I? But if simply pooping on Sony for any/all reasons is the "in" thing to do oin this board then I apologize and quietly bow out of the discussion. I've no interest in such.

Peace.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top