RSX is derived from the GeForce 7 architecture which, due to its threading implementation, doesn't lend itself to the types of processing F@H requires. The Pande group concentrated on ATI's R5xx parts and is also currently looking at G80. Look for posts on this forum by mhouston if you want more details.Could the RSX be included in the folding to help out CELL?
stanford said:3/26/2007 Update on flops count
We have been looking into the flops count and its large variations and have found one more issue. The initial stats were based off the average we had seen during testing (yielding approximately 25 GFLOPs for a single PS3). However, the pre-launch testing period used big proteins which will result in higher GFLOP utilization. When we went live, we started our initial post-launch phase with small proteins to test the scientific validity; these smaller proteins have more overhead (since they spend less time calculating the force -- which is highly optimized) and thus the GFLOPS are lower now. As we switch back to the larger proteins, we expect to see an increase in the FLOPS per machine, and thus the overall FLOP count will change dramatically. We stress that there is a wide variation in FLOPS we can get (easily a factor of 3x) and so we expect the number to vary widely until we reach some steady state average.
Anyone know how to set the folding@home program as the screensaver?
Also, I tried to get my bookmarks up in the browser on the folding@home page but couldn't. So I guess you just typed in the URL itself?
Speng.
For the sake of Sony's PR, they want to flush the system with large proteins and get the 3x increase, to hit the Petaflop landmark!
1. At the XMB crossbar highlight Folding@Home.
2. Hit the triangle button.
3. And it should give you the option to run every 10,20, or 30 minutes after idle.
And also using the internet while folding you DO have to go to google. And you can do that by going to the stats page at Folding at Home. You can't type anything in the URL.
Wow, Team B3D's output has seen a huge jump. I am still there at no 56.
lol, you act like you're the one doing the calculations!I have to fold more than 23 work units (2-3 more days) to break into 100.
I'm at 18 now... taking my own sweet time.
lol, you act like you're the one doing the calculations!
I, on the other hand, am doing the calculations by hand. On paper. And mailing them in. Hoping to complete my first work unit in 2017.
But seriously... I feel bad halting Folding for Resistance sometimes. We'll see how long this keeps up.
lol, you act like you're the one doing the calculations!
I, on the other hand, am doing the calculations by hand. On paper. And mailing them in. Hoping to complete my first work unit in 2017.
Huh. Maybe true. I had started out trying to calculate how long the single work unit was going to take me, but I got a divide by zero error so I just guessed at 10 years. I figured once I got into a rhythm it'd go pretty quick.You grossly underestimate how much slower you are than the Cell processor!
You would not be able to complete 1 billion floating point calculations on pen and paper within your life time even if you were some sort of savant. The Cell can do dozens of these every second.
Huh. Maybe true. I had started out trying to calculate how long the single work unit was going to take me, but I got a divide by zero error so I just guessed at 10 years. I figured once I got into a rhythm it'd go pretty quick.
User: *Hits circle*
F@H: "Are you sure you want to let another loved one die of cancer?"
User: "Damnit.... no.... I guess" *cancels exit*