jandlecack
Banned
Yup. I'd say they want the PS3 to establish itself in its current form and shape before they start re-designing things.
Got to say I'm sorry to hear that RSX is still on 90nm even after all this time
Too much to hope for a 45nm Cell/65nm RSX combo before Christmas, I suppose?
Yup. I'd say they want the PS3 to establish itself in its current form and shape before they start re-designing things.
The disappointment will be even more pronounced if this is the 65 nm GPU!Nobody did confirm or deny that, yet, isn't it like that? Or has there been someone who opened one of the new sku to see what is going on?
The disappointment will be even more pronounced if this is the 65 nm GPU!
oramay said:80GB PS3 Core -
* XMB idle - 111.9 watts
* DVD playback - 126.0 watts
* Game (MGS4) - 130.0 watts
40GB PS3 Core -
* XMB idle - 125.8 watts
* DVD playback - 141.2 watts
* Game (MGS4) - 155.2 watts
Because it means a cooler, smaller box isn't happening for a long time and power consumption is going to remain high across future shrinks too because the shrinks just aren't freeing up much power. Looks like at 45nm CPU+GPU we'd still be ~100 watts. That's a lot of juice for most functions.
Haven't there been some rumours about a new PS3 with smaller casing? I think the current beast is pretty ugly to be honest and something smaller and sleeker would be good for me.
Now wouldn't it be odd if the Cell were shrunk from 65 to 45nm before the RSX is even shrunk from 90 to 65nm?
Sony could also use an external power brick to make the actual ps3 smaller.
No thanks. Worst idea ever.
http://www.edepot.com/playstation3.html
The above page has been updated to include many new PS3 models, including unreleased ones. It says that models from CECHI to CECHP all have 65nm RSX. I don't know how accurate it is though.
Whatever happened to those heady early days soon after release when web sites across the world were never happier than when they were ripping their consoles to pieces to take a look at the circuit boards and cooling layout?
How? The 65nm RSX being a piece of crap would be the easiest assumption Or an increase to the originally aspired clock frequency that is possible due to 65nm die size...one can hope.
Whatever happened to those heady early days soon after release when web sites across the world were never happier than when they were ripping their consoles to pieces to take a look at the circuit boards and cooling layout?
C'mon somebody, show some balls and rip open these new console steppings to see if, indeed they contain different chips. No need to worry if they still work afterwards or not.
Really wondered about that, too . It's especially strange in this case, as there were or are much rumours about a new 65nm nvidia rsx and not only another hdd with more space. So there should be enough motivation for those people, shouldn't it ? Looking forward to such a review of the latest ps3 sku. Or at least a clarification of why there is this slightly less power consumption.