MuFu said:I was aluding to "Wii rolling off the tongue". More childish humour I'm afraid.
Oh gawd I'm slow sometimes, good one.
MuFu said:I was aluding to "Wii rolling off the tongue". More childish humour I'm afraid.
It's not pronounced that way, it's just that the "ch" sound doesn't exist in English. And since native English speaker can't even be bothered to get the names of major cities like München, Köln and Nürnberg right, I guess there's no use trying to educate them about the pronunciation of one particlar surname.Shifty Geezer said:In this case, or normally. As a Germanic name I've always known it pronounced that way, as in Koch and Pasteur's research on microbiology.
L233 said:The pronunciation of the -ch in Koch is, I think, similar to the pronunciation in the Gaelic word Loch (as in Loch Ness).
We're going of topic here so I won't carry on past this post, but I think you're being rather unfair. I'll be first to admit most Englishmen can't be bothered to learn other languages, though it does seem we have more trouble than other countries (perhaps late start?), but regards place names, we can only best-guess and go by what we hear from the media. If the news report a name wrong, everyone will be educated wrongly in that name and not have reason to question it.L233 said:It's not pronounced that way, it's just that the "ch" sound doesn't exist in English. And since native English speaker can't even be bothered to get the names of major cities like München, Köln and Nürnberg right, I guess there's no use trying to educate them about the pronunciation of one particlar surname.
You think that's bad, look at how you've spelled Deutschland in your location!L233 said:Eh, I was only half-serious. Mispronunciations are OK, I'm simply amazed that some English names for German cities don't even remotely resemble the actual Name of the city.
LOL, good point. There seem to be language-specific versions of virtually every country name.Shifty Geezer said:You think that's bad, look at how you've spelled Deutschland in your location!
I must admit, it fits....also:I spoke with branding company Igor International yesterday about Nintendo’s choice of Wii as the new name for their next-gen console.
During the interview Steve Manning became convinced that Nintendo had deliberately picked a bad name for the console and that it was, in fact, fake. Manning thinks that Nintendo is creating an enormous viral campaign by releasing a fake name and then coming back during E3 and announcing the real one.
Third, and this is a big one, there are no trademarks registered by Nintendo nor by any dummy corp in the U.S or over there for Wii. This is unprecedented for Nintendo and it is not possible that his is an oversight. If Wii were the name, they would have registered it. In fact, no new trademarks have been registered by Nintendo at all. This leads us to conclude that Nintendo has in fact registered the real name under a dummy corp, which is SOP when trying to keep a name a secret prior to launch.
Third, and this is a big one, there are no trademarks registered by Nintendo nor by any dummy corp in the U.S or over there for Wii. This is unprecedented for Nintendo and it is not possible that his is an oversight. If Wii were the name, they would have registered it. In fact, no new trademarks have been registered by Nintendo at all. This leads us to conclude that Nintendo has in fact registered the real name under a dummy corp, which is SOP when trying to keep a name a secret prior to launch.
1UP-owned trademarks like GameVideos don't turn up when we search the trademark registry - so chances are it's just the trademark database hasn't updated yet (Nintendo confirmed this after press time).
winstonsmith1978 said:What do you think about this?
http://www.joystiq.com/2006/04/28/real-people-speak-out-about-wii/
I would say for the most part, these are the type of responses Nintendo was hoping for. At the very least, Nintendo has got people doing free marketing for them.
NANOTEC said:It seems you're very upset for one reason or another.
Yet, the marching Nintendo lemmings espouse how they don't care about any of this and are going to definately own one, based on what information? Mostly Nintendo's brand, and unknown promise of a new controller. And of course, all of this devotion requires alot of mental labor defending their choice all over the boards, hence the cognitive dissonance aspect.
It's like the Apple weenies, where Steve Jobs could announce *anything*, no matter how unimpressive, and legions of hipsters would be talking about how cool it is. Brand addiction and style over substance.