So was the PS2 setup.
It's obvious that Sony's priorities are with digital and microtransactions, not enhancing online play.
I think that's the major contributing factor to anyone defecting over this hack. The hack in itself isn't majorly critical, unless people really are psychologically addicted to COD, but the lack of PSN service progress for ages will leave people wanting a better online solution looking elsewhere, and this latest incident could be the final impetus to make the switch.TBH, I've lost patience on PSN features.
It seems after all of this discussion that they are right to feel that way, too.
Personal data of 100 million accounts lost = Minor inconvenience?
On a per user basis the scale of the leak is irrelevant to the end user. That user is not more inconvenienced because a load of other people are aswell, that doesnt effect them. In fact bigger numbers are probably better because you become less of a target.
The scale of the breach is a problem for Sony, not the end user so much.
If you think that 1 month of downtime on PSN and a welcome back package of 2+2 games vs dropping the platform completely and leaving cold the money and time already invested in the games on the sony platform is a "clear cut case" i want what you are drinking.
It's risk of creditcard fraud and identity theft. Does no-one understand that? It's not a trivial thing.
They probably don't need you to decide much of a PITB risk of creditcard fraud and identity theft is.
It's risk of creditcard fraud and identity theft. Does no-one understand that? It's not a trivial thing.
It's obvious that Sony's priorities are with digital and microtransactions, not enhancing online play.
Sorry I don't understand what you said?
This has happened to me and the only pain has been down-time...and I don't play online much (also it's probably helped that I've been busy with DIY for a while now). Either way, like I said - there's been no massive pain for me.
I agree that's the ideal, but I don't think Sony can afford that, plain and simple. Given their finances, they can only offer low-loss 1st and 2nd party titles.
I'm not sure what you mean. A clear cut case of what? I said I suspected Sony isn't worried about losing it's hardcore customers over this incident and it seems that Sony would be correct to not be worried. What aspect of this are you arguing with?
People who have all of those games are already so committed to the platform I doubt Sony are too worried about losing them. It's new customers, multiple console owners and others who don't have much to lose if they abandon the platform that they are probably most worried about.
It seems after all of this discussion that they are right to feel that way, too.
They can treat it as a loss leader, stores do that all the time. So give people $6 that they can spend (loss), not enough for a dlc but maybe people will put in the rest of the money themselves to buy a dlc they have been considering, and maybe buy other stuff in the process (gain). Or maybe they just leave the $6 in there and do nothing with it, it's still something. Or maybe they buy some dynamic themes there were considering. I don't think the financial credit needed to be a huge amount really, it's more meant to be a token of "sorry, here spend some free credits in our store". I find it hard to believe that Sony can't afford that given that there are what, 20 to 30 million actually paying + online psn users? They've wasted more than that on studios they have never produced anything profitable so I don't buy it.
While giving $6 to everyone is fairer across the board i think much more people would be unhappy with it than the current package. I would and i own 3/5 of the games.
Sorry if am jumping to conclusions, but:
The discussion was about (unless i am mistaking) if the welcome back package was "ok".
And tell me how anything from that discussion proved that you were right that Sony doesn´t care about it´s "hardcore" users? If anything those that own both a PSP and a PS3 are those that gain the most.
The only thing the discussion showed was that those that actual have the PS3 as "first choice" was "ok" and there was an understanding that not every company has billions they can use to bribe their customers to stay no matter what they put them through.