Ok you are trolling. For information, I attached a screenshot of Tomb raider 2013 at max settings. day and night...
Raytracing
- Thread starter alexsok
- Start date
I did take a look at them before posting. If I am the only one, obviously there is something my vision does not pick up. Such disparity in appreciation of graphics has been happening more frequently in recent years. I will be glad if you guys can pinpoint what you like about this new thing.
Either way, I will see myself out.
Either way, I will see myself out.
I noticed that after playing games with RTGI and getting used to it, I'm way more put off by games with bad or no GI. Maybe this explains the disparity in graphics appreciation you're talking about.
Yep this is why I try really hard to clear my backlog of older games first. The newer stuff completely ruins the old stuff for me. It’s ok if I switch genres but games in the same genre I try to follow release order.
I'm also waiting to play these new games with fancy RTX effects, because in my experience RTGI can massively improve the visuals but it is borderline useable on my 4070. Rather wait a couple years and play them once I can run them well on a midrange ($600 midrange GPU lol) PC. Still don't plan on doing the $1K GPU thing.
a 4070 is no joke, and I think it isn't the GPU fault, it's just that the hardware isn't ready for full raytracing -or whatever nVidia calls Path Tracing nowadays-. We are getting there, and RT certainly broke the Moore's Law like 10000X times over, 'cos in the past a full raytraced image took several days, as seen in the old SIGGRAPH from the late 90s.
I just hope Intel does something interesting and in some years I can retire my A770 16GB which is way less powerful than a 4070, so yeah you are covered for a couple of years.
the other benefit is you may be on newer generations of hardware that can actually run the game well !
D
Deleted member 2197
Guest
from the link @pharma shared in a different thread.
www.tomshardware.com
Manor Lords is here and we benchmarked it — how much GPU horsepower do you need to play the indie hit?
Manor Lords also supports DLSS, FSR, and XeSS upscaling.
Nearly all Nintendo 64 games can now be recompiled into native PC ports to add proper ray tracing, ultrawide, high FPS, and more
www.tomshardware.com
This is incredible.
Nearly all Nintendo 64 games can now be recompiled into native PC ports to add proper ray tracing, ultrawide, high FPS, and more
Majora's Mask is the latest to benefit, but N64 Recompiled works with nearly all N64 games.
This is incredible.
D
Deleted member 2197
Guest
Basemark "Breaking Limit" Ray Tracing Benchmark Now Out, Tested With NVIDIA, AMD & Intel GPUs
Basemark's newest Breaking Limit benchmark focues on ray tracing performance on NVIDIA, AMD & Intel GPUs with DLSS 2 and FSR 2 support.
wccftech.com
There aren't a whole lot of ray-tracing-specific benchmarks out there. The ones that come to mind are 3DMark and its various RT evaluation benchmarks. Now, Basemark has rolled out its latest and cross-platform "Breaking Limit" benchmark which not only supports a wide range of high-end GPU hardware but can also be tested on various devices such as smartphones, tablets, and laptops.
The benchmark is free to download and you can grab it at this link to try it yourself and see how your hardware fares. We tested a few graphics cards of our own for now and found the results to be rather interesting.
Last edited by a moderator:
DavidGraham
Veteran
PCGH did a more detailed analysis, a 4070 Super with DLSS is 11% faster than 7900XTX with FSR.
In this benchmark DLSS is visibly faster than FSR, a 4090 is is 8% faster with DLSS, while 4070Ti Super is 12% faster, and 4070 Super is 15% faster.
www.pcgameshardware.de
In this benchmark DLSS is visibly faster than FSR, a 4090 is is 8% faster with DLSS, while 4070Ti Super is 12% faster, and 4070 Super is 15% faster.
GPUScore Breaking Limit: Der Raytracing-Benchmark im Test
Cross-Plattform-Raytracing-Benchmark: Ergebnisse
Similar threads
- Locked
