trinibwoy said:Nah, no way they'll come with an even louder cooler when GPU clocks havent changed and they're using lower power memory. They need less cooling...not more.
_xxx_ said:Lower power when clocked the same, but how is that with 1 GHz?
The Baron said:This cooler seems like it busts at least 60% more dust than the X1900XTX's cooler. I have a bad feeling.
Bouncing Zabaglione Bros. said:Nahh, it's almost an exact copy of the Arctic Cooler version, and that's actually very quiet.
trinibwoy said:Isn't it something like 45% lower power at comparable clocks? 1GHz is only a ~ 30% clock bump over the XTX's 775Mhz.
Skrying said:Can anyone explain why ATi uses straight edged fins? I've seen no solution before that uses such fins, and I was under the idea that they were a key reason behind its noise levels.
Just curious. There is a bit of difference from the fins from the X1900XTX though, which are VERY odd looking. Maybe this new fan will be able to spin at a lower speed and allow same amount of effective cooling.
satein said:HKEPC posted a picture of X1950 XTX today, here....
http://www.hkepc.com/bbs/itnews.php?tid=637970
This one is a real card and the heatsink looks a bit different to the one posted before.
CJ said:Just another rumor.... One of my sources was telling me that there is talk about ATi copying nVidia's 7950GX2 with a "X1950XT2". He doesn't know for sure if it's true or not. Personaly I think it won't happen. Two R580s in Gemini would have an enormous power usage, become incredibly hot and need a huge cooler.
tEd said:Maybe it isn't so bad if they are on 80nm.
CJ said:Then it won't be a R580 or R580+ Gemini. Both R580 and R580+ are made on 90nm.
Could be a RV570 though. RV570 has built in Gemini support and also uses the 1950-name. But then again... it would probably be called... a X1950Pro2?