Wishmaster
Newcomer
First very early Glbenchmark results from adreno 320 running LG E970
http://glbenchmark.com/phonedetails.jsp?D=LG E970
http://glbenchmark.com/phonedetails.jsp?D=LG E970
Qualcomm Krait & MSM8960 @ AnandTech
- Thread starter Arun
- Start date
D
Deleted member 13524
Guest
Meh.. no offline tests and only scores limited by v-sync..
Wishmaster
Newcomer
I agree, nothing exciting. All scores caped at 60, but at least we know that it works
Oh goodies, GL_OES_vertex_array_object at long last.
Adreno320 GLBenchmark2.1 results: http://www.glbenchmark.com/phonedetails.jsp?benchmark=glpro21&D=LG+E970&testgroup=overall
Underneath iPad3 and over all Exynos 32nm SoC based devices....ewwwww nice.
Underneath iPad3 and over all Exynos 32nm SoC based devices....ewwwww nice.
Wishmaster
Newcomer
Impressive!
Considering that it could probably get even faster with final drivers, cause I don't suppose it is using final drivers at this stage, it's even more impressive. Can't wait to see the results from new GLBenchmark 2.5.
Wonder how much faster could it get with more memory bandwidth and if it can be clocked higher when on HKMG process.
D
Deleted member 13524
Guest
Some synthetic benchmarks are through the roof, compared to A5X and Exynos 4412:
http://www.glbenchmark.com/compare....Apple iPad 3&D3=Samsung GT-I9300 Galaxy S III
Wishmaster
Newcomer
It's maxed at almost every test. Wonder how it will fare at 1080p resolution.
Would love to see it used on transformer infinity instead of 225
Wishmaster
Newcomer
GLBenchmark 2.5 will be a good start, but I agree that GLBenchmark 3.0 will judge it's true potential considering that 320 is Halti type(class?) GPU according to all the informations we got till now.
Adreno 305 will come early next year when qcom decides to put their Krait SoC's to mass market devices, so probably when TSMC improves their yields ;-)
D
Deleted member 13524
Guest
Wasn't already disclosed that the Adreno 305 would have Adreno 220 performance but with the DX11 compliance?
Wishmaster
Newcomer
According to all the informations that were disclosed up till now it should be like that.
With some 'driver magic' it could become very good entry market SoC considering that with that kind of performance it will be more powerful than tegra2. And if Grey really is improved tegra2 with baseband then it could have a problem matching 305 performance.
french toast
Veteran
I was under the impression that Qualcomm would not have a GPU with DX 11 compliance for a while?
Yes i think that is early drivers, Qualcomm shipped some dreadfull drivers for the Adreno 220 last year that spoiled its performance in a number of games when compared to the competition, when in fact it was very comparable to a Mali 400 MP4 @ 266mhz, with the new drivers.
As this is a totally new architecture, drivers are going to play a massive role, we might even see a 40-50% improvement in some areas.
Yes i think that is early drivers, Qualcomm shipped some dreadfull drivers for the Adreno 220 last year that spoiled its performance in a number of games when compared to the competition, when in fact it was very comparable to a Mali 400 MP4 @ 266mhz, with the new drivers.
As this is a totally new architecture, drivers are going to play a massive role, we might even see a 40-50% improvement in some areas.
Wishmaster
Newcomer
New device from LG running on Adreno 320
http://glbenchmark.com/phonedetails.jsp?D=LG+LS970
Scores are even higher than the ones from E970, they're catching up with iPad3 ;-)
EDIT: had to correct my grammar mistake, couldn't just stand looking at it
http://glbenchmark.com/phonedetails.jsp?D=LG+LS970
Scores are even higher than the ones from E970, they're catching up with iPad3 ;-)
EDIT: had to correct my grammar mistake, couldn't just stand looking at it
Last edited by a moderator:
Does anyone have a clue how many units the 320 contains? Twice a 225 or else 16Vec4 ALUs and 4 TMUs?
Wishmaster
Newcomer
I have no clue, but whatever it is built of it is good and can only get better
But seriously, you think that doubled number of units with improved compiler efficieny and some architectural changes to get Halti support would give it so much higher performance than 225?
4 TMU's for the 320.
Wishmaster
Newcomer
Don't know if at this moment it interests anyone, but I found on GLBenchmark(endless source of news ;-)) first results from adreno 305
http://www.glbenchmark.com/phonedetails.jsp?benchmark=glpro21&D=HTC+totemc2&testgroup=overall
For now only framelimited Egypt standard result at qHD, but even at this stage it loooks to be better than 220 so more than enough for mass market devices.
http://www.glbenchmark.com/phonedetails.jsp?benchmark=glpro21&D=HTC+totemc2&testgroup=overall
For now only framelimited Egypt standard result at qHD, but even at this stage it loooks to be better than 220 so more than enough for mass market devices.
D
Deleted member 13524
Guest
I think the difference is larger than that since the Adreno 225 in that example is running at exactly 60Hz whereas the 305 isn't completely limited by vsync. Still I guess for a chip which isn't high end that's a respectable showing.
