Q4 2002 Graphics Market Data

[AzBat]

All,

Jon Peddie Research announced new data back Jan. 30, but I didn't get the email till today. Oh well, I figured some of you might be interested in it.

Rank, Graphics Supplier, Q4'02 Market Share
1. Nvidia, 32%
2. Intel, 28%
3. ATI Technologies, 19%
4. VIA Technologies, 11%
5. Silicon Integrated Systems (SiS), 8%
6. Matrox Graphics, 1%
7. Trident Microsystems, 1%
8. Silicon Motion, <1%
9. 3Dlabs (Creative Technology), <1%

Also, it said that NVIDIA saw a 13% increase in shipments and ATI saw a 18% increase in shipments. Looks like Radeon 9xxx might of had a little effect on ATI's increase, but not as much as people would have thought.

You can see the whole announcement here...

http://www.jonpeddie.com/about/press/MarketWatch_Q402.shtml

There's more data and charts on their front page.

Tommy McClain

 

[speng]

Second Quarter

I think the second quarter results will be what would be a good indication of who's gaining and losing market share.

By that time ATI will either have won the fastest graphics card bout twice in a row, and bring over some of Nvidia's user base. Or Nvidia keeps up to speed or beats ATI and folks keep on with Nvidia.

ATI gained share but didn't take a lot from Nvidia and I think they need to beat Nvidia twice to win over a lot more folks.

Speng.

 

[antlers]

ATI's unit share stayed the same but since I bet their mix in the quarter contained quite a lot of high-end boards, I imagine their dollar share did somewhat better.

 

[Hellbinder]

People seem to forget that the 9500 series did not get out until the middle to late side of the Quarter. Thats why ATi's Shipments are so high, but its not reflected yet in sales.

Wait til Q1 03 results are in. Ati has been sellign butload of 9500 based cards.

 

[WaltC]

All,

Jon Peddie Research announced new data back Jan. 30, but I didn't get the email till today. Oh well, I figured some of you might be interested in it.

Rank, Graphics Supplier, Q4'02 Market Share
1. Nvidia, 32%
2. Intel, 28%
3. ATI Technologies, 19%
4. VIA Technologies, 11%
5. Silicon Integrated Systems (SiS), 8%
6. Matrox Graphics, 1%
7. Trident Microsystems, 1%
8. Silicon Motion, <1%
9. 3Dlabs (Creative Technology), <1%

Also, it said that NVIDIA saw a 13% increase in shipments and ATI saw a 18% increase in shipments. Looks like Radeon 9xxx might of had a little effect on ATI's increase, but not as much as people would have thought.

You can see the whole announcement here...

http://www.jonpeddie.com/about/press/MarketWatch_Q402.shtml

There's more data and charts on their front page.

Tommy McClain

Well, this is a breakdown on the entire graphics chip market by units shipped apparently. It doesn't cover the "3D chip market" separately, or focus on that section of the market which would buy a 9700Pro or GF4 Ti4600, etc., for the purpose of running a 3D game. Intel, for instance, is completely invisible in the 3D marketplace. It weighs a $10 gpu the same as a $100 gpu, and so obviously is not a reflection on the percentage of financial gain, either. Where the 9700P would have impacted ATI's financial bottom line enormously would be if ~10% or so of its 18% total gain consisted of 9700P sales. That would represent quite a bit of money, which is what the companies are interested in primarily, of course.

 

[AzBat]

]People seem to forget that the 9500 series did not get out until the middle to late side of the Quarter. Thats why ATi's Shipments are so high, but its not reflected yet in sales.

Wait til Q1 03 results are in. Ati has been sellign butload of 9500 based cards.

I agree that Q1 03 results will be more interesting, but one would have thought that Radeon 9000 shipments would have accounted more than the 9500 and it shipped in early Q4 correct?

Tommy McClain

 

[Dave Baumann]

9000 didn't actually pick up many OEM wins initially. Its gaining ground now though.

 

[AzBat]

Well, this is a breakdown on the entire graphics chip market by units shipped apparently. It doesn't cover the "3D chip market" separately, or focus on that section of the market which would buy a 9700Pro or GF4 Ti4600, etc., for the purpose of running a 3D game.

Ummm. All graphics chips now are 3D correct? So it does cover the "3D chip market". It just doesn't break it down into the market segments you were wanting. You'll need to pay for JPR's Market Watch quarterly survey to get that break down. You didn't think they would give out all the data would you? LOL

Intel, for instance, is completely invisible in the 3D marketplace. It weighs a $10 gpu the same as a $100 gpu, and so obviously is not a reflection on the percentage of financial gain, either. Where the 9700P would have impacted ATI's financial bottom line enormously would be if ~10% or so of its 18% total gain consisted of 9700P sales. That would represent quite a bit of money, which is what the companies are interested in primarily, of course.

I'll let others argue with you over those points as they have been keeping up with it better than I have.

Tommy McClain

 

[Nagorak]

9000 didn't actually pick up many OEM wins initially. Its gaining ground now though.

Because the R9700 is on top? Funny how that works...

 

[Bigus Dickus]

I'm lazy. Is this desktop only? Does it include integrated, mobile, etc.? I guess with Intel in there it must be the entire market...

 

[AzBat]

I'm lazy. Is this desktop only? Does it include integrated, mobile, etc.? I guess with Intel in there it must be the entire market...

Yes, it's the entire PC market. That's how Jon Peddie has always done it. The full report, which costs money, will include data and specifics on the individual market segments. It's all there in their press release.

Tommy McClain

 

[Nagorak]

Matrox only has 1% of the market compared to SiS's 8%?

I guess that includes integrated stuff, but still...

 

[epicstruggle]

@Nagorak: I have one of Shuttles xpc (small form factor pc) with an integrated SiS chips. Performance is pretty good, for integrated, but cant run most of humus's demos . I guess thats where a nice chunck of SiS share came from.

later,

 

[Mulciber]

@Nagorak: I have one of Shuttles xpc (small form factor pc) with an integrated SiS chips. Performance is pretty good, for integrated, but cant run most of humus's demos . I guess thats where a nice chunck of SiS share came from.

later,

did anyone see SiSs new design for an integrated Xabre 200 w/ 32mb cache built ON to the motherboard. It was weird lookin!

 

[Ernestds]

How the hell did you find this topic?

 

[Alexko]

Spambots are resourceful.